“…However, more recently, detailed energy computations and x‐ray diffraction and solution conformational investigations have shown that the picture presented above is not so simple, in that Deg, Dp n g, Dbg, Dvg ( C α,α ‐divinylglycine), Dp r g ( C α,α ‐dipropargylglycine), and Dp c g ( C α,α ‐dicyclopropylglycine) (Figure 1) rich peptides can adopt either the fully extended or the helical conformation depending upon physical state (including solvent polarity) and sequence context, thus emphasizing that energy differences between these two structures, at least at the level of these residues, are small 71–90. The delicate balance between the two conformations has been confirmed by incorporation in a host sequence of a modest point defect [an Abu guest residue perturbing the regular alignment of the side chain of a (Deg) 5 homo peptide], which is enough to drastically bias the preferred conformation toward the 3 10 ‐helix 91.…”