2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.02.125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A heterogeneous dynamic model for the simulation and optimisation of the steam methane reforming reactor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
62
1
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
2
62
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…No radial gradients in the bed; this is a valid assumption as long as the reaction scheme is not exothermic. [8] Furthermore, simulation has been performed by Lindborg [9] for the SMR process in a fixed bed reactor with different tube inner diameters, i.e. 0.1145 m, 0.2290 m, 0.3435 m, and 0.4580 m. It has been found that radial gradient increases with the increase of reactor diameter.…”
Section: Pseudo-homogeneous Fixed Bed Reactor Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…No radial gradients in the bed; this is a valid assumption as long as the reaction scheme is not exothermic. [8] Furthermore, simulation has been performed by Lindborg [9] for the SMR process in a fixed bed reactor with different tube inner diameters, i.e. 0.1145 m, 0.2290 m, 0.3435 m, and 0.4580 m. It has been found that radial gradient increases with the increase of reactor diameter.…”
Section: Pseudo-homogeneous Fixed Bed Reactor Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[6,68,8] Hence, it is seen that the SMR process is a diffusion limited process with very low effectiveness factors (less than 0.03). The Á 2 value has an asymptote at z=2.2 m. Following the analysis of Xu and Froment, [6] Pantoleontos et al [8] and Pedernera et al [69] found that this discontinuity is due to the change of the water gas shift reaction's direction. As the effectiveness factor values of the SMR process are in close agreement with the literature values, it is assumed that the conventional heterogeneous model is the best choice for the SMR process.…”
Section: Comparison Of Pseudo-homogeneous Conventional Heterogeneousmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Key assumptions of the tube gas phase model are: ideal gas law is used for approximations [16], radial variations in the reformer tubes are negligible [17,18] , the conditions of one tube represent the other tubes as well, a pre-reformer converts 2 + hydrocarbons into methane, hydrogen or carbon monoxide, so heavier-than-methane hydrocarbons are neglected in this model, and the steam/carbon ratio is high enough such that carbon deposition will not happen in the reformer [19].…”
Section: 4tube Gas Phasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the actual composition of the outflow leaving the steam reformer is a factor of the reactor temperature and operating pressure as well as the composition of the feed gas [28]. In order to produce more amount of hydrogen, carbon monoxide and steam take part in the reversible exothermic water gas shift reaction.…”
Section: Steam Reformermentioning
confidence: 99%