2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10489-022-03240-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A heterogeneous multi-attribute case retrieval method based on neutrosophic sets and TODIM for emergency situations

Abstract: Heterogeneous multi-attribute case retrieval is a crucial step in generating emergency alternatives during the course of emergency decision making (EDM) by referring to historical cases. This paper develops a heterogeneous multi-attribute case retrieval method for EDM that considers five attribute formats: crisp numbers, interval numbers, intuitionistic fuzzy numbers, single-valued neutrosophic numbers (SvNNs), and interval-valued neutrosophic numbers (IvNNs). First, we propose a similarity measurement of IvNN… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are abundant decision making methods in the field of multi-attribute decision making, such as TOPSIS [36], TODIM [37], VIKOR [38], ELECTRE [39], MULTIMOORA [40], and so on. Multi-attribute decision making methods were extended to various fields, including distribution center site selection [41], the selection of emergency solutions [42], the selection of disaster handling solutions [43], and so on. Wang et al used the fuzzy AHP method and fuzzy deviation maximizing method to calculate attribute weights and combined five types of multi-attribute decision methods, namely the TOPSIS, TODIM, VIKOR, PROMETHEE, and ELECTRE methods, with the simple dominance principle to rank the bidding options and select the best one [44].…”
Section: Multi-attribute Decision Making Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are abundant decision making methods in the field of multi-attribute decision making, such as TOPSIS [36], TODIM [37], VIKOR [38], ELECTRE [39], MULTIMOORA [40], and so on. Multi-attribute decision making methods were extended to various fields, including distribution center site selection [41], the selection of emergency solutions [42], the selection of disaster handling solutions [43], and so on. Wang et al used the fuzzy AHP method and fuzzy deviation maximizing method to calculate attribute weights and combined five types of multi-attribute decision methods, namely the TOPSIS, TODIM, VIKOR, PROMETHEE, and ELECTRE methods, with the simple dominance principle to rank the bidding options and select the best one [44].…”
Section: Multi-attribute Decision Making Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zheng [16] proposed dynamic case-based reasoning group decision-making for emergency plan generation, with the ability to adjust the generated emergency plans based on changing emergency situations. Zhang [17] developed a heterogeneous multi-attribute case retrieval method for emergency plan generation considering five information types: crisp numbers, interval numbers, intuitionistic fuzzy numbers, single-valued neutrosophic numbers, and interval-valued neutrosophic numbers. Yu et al [27] proposed a new case adaptation algorithm to accelerate the adaptation process, which was able to generate emergency plans more efficiently.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When handling emergency situations, emergency plans are the key measures and elements, and have direct influence on whether emergency situations are successfully handled or not. Therefore, due to the importance and influence of emergency plans, studies related to emergency planning have been conducted from various perspectives, such as evaluation of emergency plans [8][9][10], mathematical programmingbased emergency plan formalization [11][12][13], case-based reasoning emergency plan generation [14][15][16][17], hierarchical task network-based emergency plan generation [18,19], and various features (uncertainty, incomplete information, etc.) involving consideration of EEs within emergency plan generation [18][19][20][21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%