2010
DOI: 10.1002/fld.2456
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A heterogeneous multiscale modeling framework for hierarchical systems of partial differential equations

Abstract: SUMMARYThis paper presents a heterogeneous multiscale method with efficient interscale coupling for scaledependent phenomena modeled via a hierarchy of partial differential equations. Physics at the global level is governed by one set of partial differential equations, whereas features in the solution that are beyond the resolution capability of the coarser models are accounted for by the next refined set of differential equations. The proposed method seamlessly integrates different sets of equations governing… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, a projection operator may be required in the discrete setting to ensure that the global Darcy solution boldVitalicGZ is a well‐defined argument for the Darcy–Stokes operator scriptLitalicL on the right‐hand side of . A discussion of the implementation is given in Section 7.5 of the numerical results. Remark In the abstract framework for the hierarchically refined models presented in , the function space of global solutions is assumed to be a subset of the admissible space for the local solutions, that is, scriptSitalicGscriptSitalicL. While the LM is expected to capture the more refined physics of the system, the mathematical function spaces must satisfy the regularity requirements of the particular governing PDEs.…”
Section: The Heterogeneous Multiscale Modeling Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Also, a projection operator may be required in the discrete setting to ensure that the global Darcy solution boldVitalicGZ is a well‐defined argument for the Darcy–Stokes operator scriptLitalicL on the right‐hand side of . A discussion of the implementation is given in Section 7.5 of the numerical results. Remark In the abstract framework for the hierarchically refined models presented in , the function space of global solutions is assumed to be a subset of the admissible space for the local solutions, that is, scriptSitalicGscriptSitalicL. While the LM is expected to capture the more refined physics of the system, the mathematical function spaces must satisfy the regularity requirements of the particular governing PDEs.…”
Section: The Heterogeneous Multiscale Modeling Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remark 8: In the abstract framework for the hierarchically refined models presented in [12], the function space of global solutions is assumed to be a subset of the admissible space for the local solutions, that is, S G ⊆S L . While the LM is expected to capture the more refined physics of the system, the mathematical function spaces must satisfy the regularity requirements of the particular governing PDEs.…”
Section: The Heterogeneous Multiscale Modeling Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model for the fine-scale fields (31) is substituted in the coarse-scale problem (16)- (17). The resulting formulation can be written in an abstract form as:…”
Section: The Variational Multiscale Turbulence Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…zero applied tractions. Following the line of thought in [23][24][25][26][27][28], a numerical method is developed that draws from the stabilized discontinuous Galerkin method for finite strain kinematics with an underlying Lagrange multiplier interface formulation. The derivation of the new method hinges upon a multiscale decomposition of the deformation map locally at the Neumann boundary and subsequent modeling of the fine scales via edge bubble functions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The penalty parameter in the Nitsche method needs to be defined to ensure the coercivity of the method, and there have been many works to define this parameter through the following: (i) an a priori analysis, (ii) solving of global or local eigenvalue problems, and (iii) bubble functions approach [18][19][20][21][22]. Masud and coworkers [23][24][25][26][27][28] have developed a unified formulation for interface coupling and frictional contact modeling where the penalty parameter is derived through variational multiscale (VMS) framework, and a Lagrange multiplier field is approximated as a simple average of fluxes. Truster and Masud [29] have extended this framework to finite deformations where the stabilization tensor is consistently derived and is a function of both material and geometric nonlinearity.The deformation of multi-constituent mixtures at the Neumann boundaries requires imposing constraint conditions such that the constituents deform in a self-consistent fashion.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%