1999
DOI: 10.1007/bf01210687
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A hierarchical design concept for shape optimization based on the interaction of CAGD and FEM

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to the B-spline approach [9], our approach avoids the troubles of converting polygonal meshes into B-spline patches in the cases without CAD information, and has no need for trim curves of NURBS patches or awkward constraint management between B-spline patches. In addition, our approach is well suited for handling arbitrary topology, compared to the limitation of the B-spline approaches.…”
Section: Propositionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast to the B-spline approach [9], our approach avoids the troubles of converting polygonal meshes into B-spline patches in the cases without CAD information, and has no need for trim curves of NURBS patches or awkward constraint management between B-spline patches. In addition, our approach is well suited for handling arbitrary topology, compared to the limitation of the B-spline approaches.…”
Section: Propositionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…(2) Optimization methods: gradient-based method [4,5], genetic method [6], dynamic simulation [7], heuristic evolution [3], etc. (3) Geometry: mesh-based [8], CAD-based [9,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two main considerations have evolved to bypass these conceptual shortcomings. On the one hand, a separate geometry model can be employed to govern the design update procedure [4][5][6][7]. By this mechanism, the inconvenient direct manipulation of nodal point coordinates within the corresponding finite element representation is avoided.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A considerable amount of work in the area of shape optimization of structures has been conducted in the past. From the perspective of geometric representation, these approaches can be generally categorized as either CAD-based [1][2][3][4][5][6][7] or mesh-based [8][9][10][11][12][13]. For a more detailed classification, readers may refer to Reference [14], which contains an excellent review on different shape parameterization techniques.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%