1997
DOI: 10.1006/jsvi.1996.0797
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Hierarchical Functions Set for Predicting Very High Order Plate Bending Modes With Any Boundary Conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
60
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A Rayleigh-Ritz approach was used to develop the plate displacement in the baffled case, as well as the pressure jump in the unbaffled case. The plate mode shape function was defined by applying a set of trigonometric functions for arbitrary boundary conditions [35]. As in Laulagnet's model [33], the pressure jump was also expanded in terms of a series of modes.…”
Section: Unbaffled Plate Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A Rayleigh-Ritz approach was used to develop the plate displacement in the baffled case, as well as the pressure jump in the unbaffled case. The plate mode shape function was defined by applying a set of trigonometric functions for arbitrary boundary conditions [35]. As in Laulagnet's model [33], the pressure jump was also expanded in terms of a series of modes.…”
Section: Unbaffled Plate Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…provide a su cient condition satisfying (13). Now, in order to give a simple representation of u on the boundary , it is convenient to group the set of indices e; l; n into a single index.…”
Section: Presentation Of the Finite Element Basismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The terms u functions could be employed such as high order polynomials (Lagrangian, Legendre or BSpline wavelets) or trigonometric-like bases (see for instance References [13,14], in the domain of structural dynamic analysis), the speciÿc feature of (10) is the physical meaning of such a decomposition. This latter point is discussed at the end of this section.…”
Section: Presentation Of the Finite Element Basismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the use of beam function will lead to at least a very tedious solution process [38]. The problem with using a complete set of orthogonal polynomials is that the higher-order polynomials tend to become numerically unstable because of the computer round-off errors [38,39]. These numerical difficulties can be avoided by the Fourier series because the Fourier series constitute a complete set and exhibit an excellent numerical stability.…”
Section: Admissible Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%