2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.04.052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A hierarchical model for simultaneous detection and estimation in multi-subject fMRI studies

Abstract: In this paper we introduce a new hierarchical model for the simultaneous detection of brain activation and estimation of the shape of the hemodynamic response in multi-subject fMRI studies. The proposed approach circumvents a major stumbling block in standard multi-subject fMRI data analysis, in that it both allows the shape of the hemodynamic response function to vary across region and subjects, while still providing a straightforward way to estimate population-level activation. An e cient estimation algorith… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some solutions have been proposed for this joint comparison, yet none is widely accepted yet [51,55]. Recent work combining estimation of the HRF shape with detection of activation in the same optimization seems a step in the right direction [56,57], though these approaches currently assume that HRF shape is similar across subjects in a given brain region, which may not be a valid assumption when investigating individual differences.…”
Section: Validity: Are Individual Differences Attributable To Brain Fmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some solutions have been proposed for this joint comparison, yet none is widely accepted yet [51,55]. Recent work combining estimation of the HRF shape with detection of activation in the same optimization seems a step in the right direction [56,57], though these approaches currently assume that HRF shape is similar across subjects in a given brain region, which may not be a valid assumption when investigating individual differences.…”
Section: Validity: Are Individual Differences Attributable To Brain Fmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lindquist (2008) and Zhang et al (2015) provide detailed reviews on existing methods. Methods for brain activation are proposed in Friston et al (1994); Worsley and Friston (1995); Smith and Fahrmeir (2007); David et al (2008); Guo and Pagnoni (2008); Xu et al (2009); Degras and Lindquist (2014). Methods for brain connectivity are developed in Friston et al (2003); Harrison et al (2003); Bowman et al (2008); Cribben et al (2012); Kang et al (2012); Gorrostieta et al (2013); Luo (2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Group analyses involve combining individual SPMs across subjects. A multisubject approach analyzes all subjects at the same time to estimate a group level activation and the shape of the HRF simultaneously (Degras & Lindquist, 2014;Makni, Ciuciu, Idier, & Poline, 2005;Makni et al, 2008;Vincent, Risser, & Ciuciu, 2010). In this work, we focus on the subject-wise analysis assuming that individual maps are provided after statistical modeling of voxel time series.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%