2014
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msu037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A High-Definition View of Functional Genetic Variation from Natural Yeast Genomes

Abstract: The question of how genetic variation in a population influences phenotypic variation and evolution is of major importance in modern biology. Yet much is still unknown about the relative functional importance of different forms of genome variation and how they are shaped by evolutionary processes. Here we address these questions by population level sequencing of 42 strains from the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae and its closest relative S. paradoxus. We find that genome content variation, in the form o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

21
317
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 277 publications
(338 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
21
317
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite S. paradoxus displaying levels of genetic variation that are far greater than those observed for S. cerevisiae, there appears to be considerably less gene content variation within this species (Bergström et al 2014). This difference in SNP vs. gene content variation may reflect the different selective pressures observed between the natural ecological niches of S. paradoxus in contrast to the potentially sudden and disruptive pressures imposed upon S. cerevisiae during its transition toward "domestication."…”
Section: S Cerevisiae Model For Fundamental Biology and Industrial Wmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Despite S. paradoxus displaying levels of genetic variation that are far greater than those observed for S. cerevisiae, there appears to be considerably less gene content variation within this species (Bergström et al 2014). This difference in SNP vs. gene content variation may reflect the different selective pressures observed between the natural ecological niches of S. paradoxus in contrast to the potentially sudden and disruptive pressures imposed upon S. cerevisiae during its transition toward "domestication."…”
Section: S Cerevisiae Model For Fundamental Biology and Industrial Wmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…However, as with all species, there is more to S. cerevisiae than one strain. For example, array analyses McCusker 2009b, 2011;Schacherer et al 2009;Dunn et al 2012), low coverage sequencing (Liti et al 2009), and higher coverage sequencing (Wei et al 2007;Doniger et al 2008;Dowell et al 2010;Skelly et al 2013;Bergstrom et al 2014) of a limited number of additional S. cerevisiae strains identified extensive sequence variation. Studies of S. cerevisiae genetic variation and its influence on phenotypic variation have been limited by the modest number of high quality, complete, assembled, and annotated genome sequences.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dynamics involving mutations in populations depend on accumulation, natural selection, competition within the population itself and overall fitness (Lee and Marx, 2013;Bergström et al, 2014). Understanding native yeast population and evolution dynamics is important in order to comprehend how the stressing factors of the fermentation process impact the commercial yeast strains go through and how they interact with competitive invasive strains (Payen et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mid-season isolates displayed predominantly smooth colony surface, differing from the end-season isolates, which displayed more rough morphotypes (Table 2). This can be caused by adaptive evolution, caused by the cell recycling process, among other stressing factors (Bergström et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%