2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0168-9525(01)02446-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A high density of X-linked genes for general cognitive ability: a run-away process shaping human evolution?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
186
0
6

Year Published

2006
2006
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 252 publications
(195 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
3
186
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…32 Approximately, out of 282 human MR genes, 16% reside on the X chromosome, whereas its content represent only 3.37 -4% of all known and predicted genes (a four-fold overrepresentation). In line with these estimates is another OMIM-based analysis study reported by Zechner et al 37 The authors reported a 7.2-fold X-chromosome bias for MR genes, whereas genes causing common morphological phenotypes (polydactyly, cleft palate, facial dysplasia, skeletal dysplasia and growth retardation) have, on average, only a 2.4-fold X-chromosome bias. However, in view of some recent epidemiological and molecular data, this apparent biased distribution will probably not resist prospective studies that integrate recent estimates downwards of XLMR prevalence 12,13 and contribution of submicroscopic rearrangements in MR conditions, as well as evaluation of the potential number of autosomal dominant and recessive MR genes, which are much more difficult to delineate because of the scarcity of affected families.…”
Section: Monogenic Causes Involved In Mental Retardation Disorderssupporting
confidence: 56%
“…32 Approximately, out of 282 human MR genes, 16% reside on the X chromosome, whereas its content represent only 3.37 -4% of all known and predicted genes (a four-fold overrepresentation). In line with these estimates is another OMIM-based analysis study reported by Zechner et al 37 The authors reported a 7.2-fold X-chromosome bias for MR genes, whereas genes causing common morphological phenotypes (polydactyly, cleft palate, facial dysplasia, skeletal dysplasia and growth retardation) have, on average, only a 2.4-fold X-chromosome bias. However, in view of some recent epidemiological and molecular data, this apparent biased distribution will probably not resist prospective studies that integrate recent estimates downwards of XLMR prevalence 12,13 and contribution of submicroscopic rearrangements in MR conditions, as well as evaluation of the potential number of autosomal dominant and recessive MR genes, which are much more difficult to delineate because of the scarcity of affected families.…”
Section: Monogenic Causes Involved In Mental Retardation Disorderssupporting
confidence: 56%
“…The X chromosome is also enriched in intelligence-related genes, mutations in which result in various X-linked mental retardation syndromes (Zechner et al, 2001). This bias was hypothesized to be the result of sexual selection, with smarter males being selected by females, either because of their superior ability to care for young or because intelligence, being an expensive trait (like peacocks' tails), is an indicator of superior genes (reviewed in Graves et al, 2002).…”
Section: Y1y2y3y4y5mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In humans, determining the role of a candidate gene requires associating different gene variants with individual differences in the function of interest (Plomin et al, 2008). While virtually no candidate genes currently exist for higher level perception, given that a number of specific genes are known to affect neural and cognitive function (Zechner et al, 2001), and that the genetics of color vision has been fairly well mapped out (Nathans et al, 1986a b), such candidate genes may be within reach.…”
Section: Genetic/environmental Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%