2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2010.07.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A high efficacy steam soil disinfestation system, part II: Design and testing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
32
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
32
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Further reduction of the heating and cooling phases could be accomplished by treating the seeds without their dispersal into soil. Although, data acquired under such conditions is limited practically, as real soil thermal treatments are always affected by discrete heating and cooling phases (Gay et al , 2010 a , b ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Further reduction of the heating and cooling phases could be accomplished by treating the seeds without their dispersal into soil. Although, data acquired under such conditions is limited practically, as real soil thermal treatments are always affected by discrete heating and cooling phases (Gay et al , 2010 a , b ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This information is relevant for fine‐tuning the use of steam in thermal soil treatments and may further reduce the energy requirement of this technique. This can be in particular useful for steam application techniques based on localised injections for short durations, as in the case of band steaming (Ascard et al , ) or sub‐superficial soil steaming (Gay et al , 2010 a , b ). Caution must be adopted when considering real field treatment and conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following steps were implemented: the residual condensate in the SDP was drained before the test; the boiler pressure was adjusted to 0.3 MPa; the saturated dry steam temperature was increased to 132.88 • C; the flow valve opening through the flow meter was calibrated; and the steam flow was calibrated to 2, 3, and 4 kg/h. The SDP was inserted into test areas (depth= −20 cm) for different particle diameters [6,7], and the surface of the soil bin was sealed with an iron cover to prevent steam overflow. According to the theoretical and simulation calculations, the disinfection times of the flow rates of 2, 3, and 4 kg/h are set to 360, 240, and 180 s, respectively.…”
Section: Test Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…flow was calibrated to 2, 3, and 4 kg/h. The SDP was inserted into test areas (depth= −20 cm) for different particle diameters [6,7], and the surface of the soil bin was sealed with an iron cover to prevent steam overflow. According to the theoretical and simulation calculations, the disinfection times of the flow rates of 2, 3, and 4 kg/h are set to 360, 240, and 180 s, respectively.…”
Section: Test Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation