2022
DOI: 10.1007/s41365-022-01092-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A high fidelity general purpose 3-D Monte Carlo particle transport program JMCT3.0

Abstract: JMCT is a large-scale, high-fidelity, three-dimensional general neutron–photon–electron–proton transport Monte Carlo software system. It was developed based on the combinatorial geometry parallel infrastructure JCOGIN and the adaptive structured mesh infrastructure JASMIN. JMCT is equipped with CAD modeling and visualizes the image output. It supports the geometry of the body and the structured/unstructured mesh. JMCT has most functions, variance reduction techniques, and tallies of the traditional Monte Carlo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among many high-fidelity simulation methods, the Monte Carlo (MC) method is widely regarded as the most accurate method and is usually used for validations of other methods. The MC method has two major advantages: one is the usage of accurate continuous-energy crosssections, and another is the precise 3-dimensional (3D) geometry modeling based on constructive solid geometry (CSG) or computer-aided design (CAD) geometry (Wilson et al, 2010;Davis et al, 2020;Deng et al, 2022). MC codes such as MCNP 10.3389/fenrg.2022.1010482 (Goorley et al, 2012), Serpent (Leppänen et al, 2015), OpenMC (Romano et al, 2015), and RMC (Wang et al, 2015) are widely used in new reactor designs, which have disparate features from normal nuclear reactors in geometry, material, and spectra.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among many high-fidelity simulation methods, the Monte Carlo (MC) method is widely regarded as the most accurate method and is usually used for validations of other methods. The MC method has two major advantages: one is the usage of accurate continuous-energy crosssections, and another is the precise 3-dimensional (3D) geometry modeling based on constructive solid geometry (CSG) or computer-aided design (CAD) geometry (Wilson et al, 2010;Davis et al, 2020;Deng et al, 2022). MC codes such as MCNP 10.3389/fenrg.2022.1010482 (Goorley et al, 2012), Serpent (Leppänen et al, 2015), OpenMC (Romano et al, 2015), and RMC (Wang et al, 2015) are widely used in new reactor designs, which have disparate features from normal nuclear reactors in geometry, material, and spectra.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The "Best Estimate" Approach. In recent years, there has been a growing interest in a promising alternative, the socalled "best estimate" methodology, based on high-fidelity Monte Carlo codes, e.g., Serpent [13], MCNP [14], and OpenMC [15], for detailed neutronic analyses characterized by high accuracy and flexible implementation [16][17][18][19][20]. This class of models, characterized by very fine spatial resolution, continuous energy spectrum, and continuous angular distribution, are referred to as high-fidelity models and allow detailed investigations of localized phenomena.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%