2013
DOI: 10.1109/tce.2013.6626260
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A high performance deblocking filter hardware for high efficiency video coding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The comparison among some previous work and the proposed design is drawn in Table II. As Table II shows, our design can achieve 318MHz TABLE II. PLEMENTATIONS COMPARIS working frequency at most, which makes it capable of supporting 8kx4k@90fps and it is much higher than [5] and [7]. The throughput in [6] is close to ours, however it does not consider the cycles of data loading and output.…”
Section: Implementation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The comparison among some previous work and the proposed design is drawn in Table II. As Table II shows, our design can achieve 318MHz TABLE II. PLEMENTATIONS COMPARIS working frequency at most, which makes it capable of supporting 8kx4k@90fps and it is much higher than [5] and [7]. The throughput in [6] is close to ours, however it does not consider the cycles of data loading and output.…”
Section: Implementation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…In [5], two parallel data paths with 10 SRAMs were applied to increase its performance with the cost of larger areas and memory management complexity, meanwhile its performance is not very high which can only support 1920x1080@30fps real time encoding. In [6], an architecture with a novel memory interlacing organization and four-stage pipeline is proposed, however it only processes 32x32 LCU and the pixels loading and output are not considered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[4] and [5], while achieves much higher system throughput. Compared with the HEVC DBF design in [6], the proposed architecture achieves much higher throughput than the 2-path implementation with a little cost increase, and it reaches both higher throughput and lower cost than the 6-path one. The design in [7] achieves a quite high system throughput by employing four parallel filters, which also results in a large hardware cost.…”
Section: B Filtering Order and Memory Organizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A hardware DBF design for HEVC with parallel data-paths was proposed in [6] and a four-stage pipeline architecture was presented in [7]. To support real-time processing of high definition videos, parallel architectures were adopted in both of them.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%