2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2011.09.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A high prevalence of mupirocin and macrolide resistance determinant among Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from burnt patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

8
27
5
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
8
27
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The high level of clindamycin resistance may be associated with inconsistent use of this antibiotic in clinical practice and community and also constitutive and inducible resistance. The rate of resistance to rifampicin was higher in our study (31.2%) compared to those reported in other studies from Germany (2%) (29) and Iran (5%) (24). In contrast to the results of the present study, high level of resistance to rifampicin was reported from Iraqi Kurdistan (57%) (21).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The high level of clindamycin resistance may be associated with inconsistent use of this antibiotic in clinical practice and community and also constitutive and inducible resistance. The rate of resistance to rifampicin was higher in our study (31.2%) compared to those reported in other studies from Germany (2%) (29) and Iran (5%) (24). In contrast to the results of the present study, high level of resistance to rifampicin was reported from Iraqi Kurdistan (57%) (21).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 94%
“…The present study showed that mupirocin resistance phenotype was observed in 27% of MRSA isolates. This finding confirmed previous similar observations by Shahsavan et al (24) from Tehran, Iran (25%).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Shahsavan et al in their inquiry which was performed in 2012, have reported that 58.8% of their S. aureus isolates were resistant to methicillin and 40% were resistant to mupirocin (14). The rate of mupirocin resistance in our study was lower (i.e.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 59%
“…In a study conducted by Shahsavan et al (33), it was shown that 25% of mupirucin resistant MRSA isolates carried the mupA gene. Unrestricted policies that allow the improper and widespread use of mupirocin for long periods in hospitals and health care settings and the origin of the isolates and clinical samples are the most important causes of variation in the incidence rate of resistance to mupirocin in MRSA isolates (8,32,33).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%