2016
DOI: 10.3847/2041-8205/828/1/l6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A High Stellar Velocity Dispersion and ∼100 Globular Clusters for the Ultra-Diffuse Galaxy Dragonfly 44

Abstract: Recently a population of large, very low surface brightness, spheroidal galaxies was identified in the Coma cluster. The apparent survival of these ultra-diffuse galaxies (UDGs) in a rich cluster suggests that they have very high masses. Here, we present the stellar kinematics of Dragonfly44, one of the largest Coma UDGs, using a 33.5 hr integration with DEIMOS on the Keck II telescope. We find a velocity dispersion of s = - . The mass-to-light ratio is, and the dark matter fraction is 98% within r 1 2 . The … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
129
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 236 publications
(141 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
9
129
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, a UDG population is an important indicator of dynamic processes in clusters and groups. From the data in [31,32], ultra-diffuse galaxies have a high darkto-stellar mass ratio, which can reach M DM /M * about 10 2 -10 3 for them.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, a UDG population is an important indicator of dynamic processes in clusters and groups. From the data in [31,32], ultra-diffuse galaxies have a high darkto-stellar mass ratio, which can reach M DM /M * about 10 2 -10 3 for them.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…of M h ∼ 10 12 M , i.e., similar to the halo of the Milky Way (van Dokkum et al 2016; but see also Di Cintio et al 2017). and Beasley & Trujillo (2016) have also inferred very high dynamical-to-stellar mass ratios for the UDGs VCC 1287 and Dragonfly-17, but argue that their host halos have dwarf-scale masses (M h ∼ 10 11 M ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…We estimate a halo mass from the best fitting profiles from Di Cintio et al (2017) (Wang et al 2015). The dynamical mass estimates from and van Dokkum et al (2016) are marked by grey circles and a grey triangle respectively. The measured and predicted profiles show good agreement, suggesting halo masses below 10 11 M .…”
Section: The Halo Profile and Massmentioning
confidence: 99%