2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2023.341184
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A high-throughput atomic emission analyzer for simultaneous field detection of dissolved inorganic and organic carbon in seawater and lake water

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To solve these problems and improve analytical performance, the MP-OES has been coupled with many sample introduction techniques, including cold vapor generation, 22 hydride generation, 18 photochemical vapor generation, 23 tungsten coil (Wcoil) electrothermal vaporization, 24,25 and solid-phase microextraction (SPME). 21,[26][27][28] These sampling approaches can efficiently separate analytes from liquid phase as "dry" species before their exposure to microplasma, significantly enhancing the MP-OES sensitivity and alleviating matrix interferences.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To solve these problems and improve analytical performance, the MP-OES has been coupled with many sample introduction techniques, including cold vapor generation, 22 hydride generation, 18 photochemical vapor generation, 23 tungsten coil (Wcoil) electrothermal vaporization, 24,25 and solid-phase microextraction (SPME). 21,[26][27][28] These sampling approaches can efficiently separate analytes from liquid phase as "dry" species before their exposure to microplasma, significantly enhancing the MP-OES sensitivity and alleviating matrix interferences.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, for field analysis, only sample introduction and detection are often focused on, and sample pretreatment in the field is ignored. As a result, most microplasma OES methods and devices are suitable for field analysis of environmental water samples instead of biological samples. Although direct determination of heavy metals in biological samples can be achieved by electrothermal/electromagnetic heating vaporization, the treated sample amount (0.15–20 mg) is very small, ,, leading to a higher detection limit. In addition, this method can only treat one sample at a time, greatly limiting the analytical throughput, and the high heating power makes it difficult to achieve long-term battery power, so it is still limited in field analysis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%