2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2014.06.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A high-throughput robotic sample preparation system and HPLC-MS/MS for measuring urinary anatabine, anabasine, nicotine and major nicotine metabolites

Abstract: Background Most sample preparation methods characteristically involve intensive and repetitive labor, which is inefficient when preparing large numbers of samples from population-scale studies. Methods This study presents a robotic system designed to meet the sampling requirements for large population-scale studies. Using this robotic system, we developed and validated a method to simultaneously measure urinary anatabine, anabasine, nicotine and seven major nicotine metabolites: 4-Hydroxy-4-(3-pyridyl)butano… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
47
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, these latter metabolites are not specific to NNK; they can also be produced during the metabolism of nicotine and perhaps other TSNAs. 2,1921 For these reasons NNAL in human urine is recognized as the preferred biomarker of NNK exposure from tobacco. 2,22,23 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these latter metabolites are not specific to NNK; they can also be produced during the metabolism of nicotine and perhaps other TSNAs. 2,1921 For these reasons NNAL in human urine is recognized as the preferred biomarker of NNK exposure from tobacco. 2,22,23 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, rapid and reliable determination of nicotine is still necessary and constitutes a current challenge for analytical chemists. Determination of nicotine is mostly carried out by means of modern separation techniques such as gas chromatography (Hossain and Salehuddin, 2013) and high-performance liquid chromatography (Wei et al, 2014), capillary electrophoresis (Sánchez-Hernández et al, 2014), imunological methods (Dhar, 2004), spectrophotometry (Yasuda et al, 2013) as well as electrochemical methods (Švorc et al, 2014ab). Chromatographic and immunological methods are both sensitive but are also expensive, time-consuming, lab-based techniques requiring skilled operators.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 Average extraction recoveries for all analytes ranged from 54 to 93% and 18 to 75% for “free” and “total” measurements, respectively (Table 1). Ion suppression due to matrix effect varied from −9 to 32 and −41 to 32 for “free” and “total” measurements, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%