2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2020.04.020
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A High-Throughput Screen for Transcription Activation Domains Reveals Their Sequence Features and Permits Prediction by Deep Learning

Abstract: Highlights d A deep learning model for AD prediction was derived from a large set of synthetic ADs d The predictor (ADpred) identifies sequence features important for acidic AD function d AD sequence features explain the basis for the fuzzy binding mechanism of acidic ADs d Acidic ADs are enriched in yeast but not in Drosophila or human transcription factors

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

18
152
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(170 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
18
152
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Acidic Exposure Model extends from yeast to human cells with one elaboration: a larger role for leucine residues in human cells. In yeast, we focused on the central AD of Gcn4, where aromatic residues made large contributions to activity while leucine and methionine made smaller contributions (Erijman et al, 2020; Jackson et al, 1996; Ravarani et al, 2018; Staller et al, 2018). In human cells, we found three pieces of evidence that leucine residues make large contributions to AD activity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Acidic Exposure Model extends from yeast to human cells with one elaboration: a larger role for leucine residues in human cells. In yeast, we focused on the central AD of Gcn4, where aromatic residues made large contributions to activity while leucine and methionine made smaller contributions (Erijman et al, 2020; Jackson et al, 1996; Ravarani et al, 2018; Staller et al, 2018). In human cells, we found three pieces of evidence that leucine residues make large contributions to AD activity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Developing analogous high throughput methods for studying ADs will help close the understanding gap with DBDs. We and others have recently developed high-throughput methods for studying ADs in yeast, fly cells and human cells (Arnold et al, 2018; Erijman et al, 2020; Ravarani et al, 2018; Staller et al, 2018; Tycko et al, 2020). Building upon our work in yeast, here, we present a high-throughput method for studying AD variants in human cell culture.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It expands the catalog of functional transcriptional effector domains but is certainly still incomplete. We envision new library designs that tile transcription factors or focus on regions with activator-like signatures will identify additional human activator domains, as such designs have uncovered activators in yeast and Drosophila experiments (Arnold et al, 2018;Erijman et al, 2020;Ravarani et al, 2018). Without major modifications, HTrecruit should be compatible with any cell type that is transfectable (to integrate the reporter) and transducible by lentivirus (to deliver the library).…”
Section: High-throughput Protein Domain Functional Screens In Human Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recruitment assay has been applied extensively to characterize individual proteins and some fusions of multiple effectors (Amabile et al, 2016;Konermann et al, 2014), but the throughput of this assay is limited because each effector protein is individually cloned, delivered into cells, and measured. Recently, systematic recruitment of hundreds of chromatin regulators was achieved in yeast in an arrayed screen (Keung et al, 2014), and, in the last few years, pooled strategies for recruitment assays of activator domains were fruitfully implemented in yeast (Erijman et al, 2020;Staller et al, 2018) and Drosophila cells (Arnold et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent evidence hints at how this may be achieved. Mediator subunits in its tail sub-module have been shown to engage in a high number of low specificity and weak interactions via phase separation, thereby achieving a “fuzzy” interaction between Mediator and the activation domains of many different transcription factors [ [24] , [25] , [26] , [27] ]. The second arm of the Mediator bridge extends to interact with the pre-initiation complex, inducing the recruitment of RNA Pol II at target promoters [ 20 ] ( Fig.…”
Section: Mediator: a Bridge Between Enhancers And Promotersmentioning
confidence: 99%