2008
DOI: 10.1002/cyto.a.20550
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A high‐throughput system for segmenting nuclei using multiscale techniques

Abstract: Automatic segmentation of cell nuclei is critical in several high-throughput cytometry applications whereas manual segmentation is laborious and irreproducible. One such emerging application is measuring the spatial organization (radial and relative distances) of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) DNA sequences, where recent investigations strongly suggest a correlation between nonrandom arrangement of genes to carcinogenesis. Current automatic segmentation methods have varying performance in the presen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
64
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
1
64
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean value was 76%, which, as expected, was lower than other reported accuracies that were measured over only true positive objects. When we evaluated AS for true positive objects only, to be consistent with other reported results, we obtained 91.3% (Table 1), which is equivalent to the accuracy we have achieved for nuclei in cell culture (31) and is significantly improved over reported accuracy in cancer tissue of 80% (53).…”
Section: Segmentation Accuracy Of Selected Nucleisupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The mean value was 76%, which, as expected, was lower than other reported accuracies that were measured over only true positive objects. When we evaluated AS for true positive objects only, to be consistent with other reported results, we obtained 91.3% (Table 1), which is equivalent to the accuracy we have achieved for nuclei in cell culture (31) and is significantly improved over reported accuracy in cancer tissue of 80% (53).…”
Section: Segmentation Accuracy Of Selected Nucleisupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Also, our algorithm is about two times faster than adaptive thresholding followed by modelbased cluster separation. The segmentation accuracy we achieved is also better than the accuracy of 84% recently reported by Gudla et al (17) using an algorithm that was designed to work in the presence of uneven illumination and clustered nuclei. Note, however, that the stated segmentation accuracy values are difficult to compare because different images were used.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 47%
“…To separate clusters of nuclei, watershed-based techniques (e.g., 12,14,15) and approaches employing geometric properties (16) have been proposed. Recently, an approach based on multiscale entropybased thresholding and region merging has been described (17). An approach based on the zero-crossings of the Laplacian was used in (18).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, instead of rejecting these incorrectly segmented features from the analysis their recognition could also be used for enhanced segmentation. Several groups have proposed methods to merge (39,40) or separate (41,42) incorrectly segmented nuclei or groups of nuclei and by doing so, increase yield, while maintaining relatively high accuracy. The modularity and open character of the presented analysis allows future incorporation of such improvements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%