2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2006.07.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A High-throughput two-phase partition assay to measure the activity of lipid-metabolizing enzymes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After phase partitioning by the addition of a phase partition scintillation fluid (MicroScint-E, PerkinElmer), which serves as both a scintillation fluid and a phase partition agent, the generated product [ 14 C]tridecanoylglycerol ([ 14 C]TAG) was quantified from the upper organic phase. 27 An initial experiment comparing DGAT2 versus mock membranes (1.5 μg for each), which was analyzed via TLC, showed that the mock membrane generated significant levels of [ 14 C]decanoic acid (1.26 μM, 13% hydrolysis of [ 14 C]decanoyl-CoA) (Figure 2A, lane 1) while the DGAT2 membrane generated 1.73 μM [ 14 C]TAG as well as 0.44 μM [ 14 C]decanoic acid (Figure 2A, lane 6) under the DGAT2 assay conditions described in Materials and Methods, except 10 μM [ 14 C]decanoyl-CoA and 30 μM 1,2-didecanoyl-sn-glycerol were used as substrates in this assay. Because the background activity ([ 14 C]decanoic acid generated by mock membrane) is significant (∼25% of [ 14 C]TAG) in the DGAT2 reaction, this system would not allow an optimal DGAT2 assay window without separation of [ 14 C]TAG from [ 14 C]decanoic acid.…”
Section: ■ Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…After phase partitioning by the addition of a phase partition scintillation fluid (MicroScint-E, PerkinElmer), which serves as both a scintillation fluid and a phase partition agent, the generated product [ 14 C]tridecanoylglycerol ([ 14 C]TAG) was quantified from the upper organic phase. 27 An initial experiment comparing DGAT2 versus mock membranes (1.5 μg for each), which was analyzed via TLC, showed that the mock membrane generated significant levels of [ 14 C]decanoic acid (1.26 μM, 13% hydrolysis of [ 14 C]decanoyl-CoA) (Figure 2A, lane 1) while the DGAT2 membrane generated 1.73 μM [ 14 C]TAG as well as 0.44 μM [ 14 C]decanoic acid (Figure 2A, lane 6) under the DGAT2 assay conditions described in Materials and Methods, except 10 μM [ 14 C]decanoyl-CoA and 30 μM 1,2-didecanoyl-sn-glycerol were used as substrates in this assay. Because the background activity ([ 14 C]decanoic acid generated by mock membrane) is significant (∼25% of [ 14 C]TAG) in the DGAT2 reaction, this system would not allow an optimal DGAT2 assay window without separation of [ 14 C]TAG from [ 14 C]decanoic acid.…”
Section: ■ Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have utilized the DGAT2 membrane fraction prepared from the Sf9 insect cell expression system as a source of DGAT2 enzyme, which has been widely used in the literature. , ,,,,, DGAT2 activity was determined by measuring the incorporation of the [1- 14 C]­decanoyl moiety into triacylglycerol using [1- 14 C]­decanoyl-CoA and 1,2-didecanoyl- sn -glycerol as substrates. After phase partitioning by the addition of a phase partition scintillation fluid (MicroScint-E, PerkinElmer), which serves as both a scintillation fluid and a phase partition agent, the generated product [ 14 C]­tridecanoylglycerol ([ 14 C]­TAG) was quantified from the upper organic phase . An initial experiment comparing DGAT2 versus mock membranes (1.5 μg for each), which was analyzed via TLC, showed that the mock membrane generated significant levels of [ 14 C]­decanoic acid (1.26 μM, 13% hydrolysis of [ 14 C]­decanoyl-CoA) (Figure A, lane 1) while the DGAT2 membrane generated 1.73 μM [ 14 C]­TAG as well as 0.44 μM [ 14 C]­decanoic acid (Figure A, lane 6) under the DGAT2 assay conditions described in Materials and Methods, except 10 μM [ 14 C]­decanoyl-CoA and 30 μM 1,2-didecanoyl- sn -glycerol were used as substrates in this assay.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…one published 2-phase partition assay relies on a viscous liquid scintillation fluid that can be difficult to rapidly and accurately dispense in low microliter volumes. 7 in addition, the light emission from the scintillation fluid is blue-shifted, a less favorable emission profile for compound screening compared to red light emission. another assay using the scintillation format for fatty acids requires the phospholipid coating of a scintillating microplate to capture labeled fatty acids.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%