“…Multiferroic was initially coined by Aizu in 1968 with the theoretical identification of 42 species of simultaneously ferroelectric and ferroelastic phase transition . The famous inorganic Gd 2 (MoO 4 ) 3 with the fully ferroelectric–fully ferroelastic effect was predicted and successfully validated in 1968, serving as a typical model for fully multiferroic over subsequent decades. , The characteristic of a type of ferroelectric–ferroelastic crystal is that the concurrent alteration of the polarization vector alongside changes in the strain tensor, and vice versa, is fully ferroelectric and fully ferroelastic. − Capitalizing on these dual ferroic effects, the development of high-precision electronic micropositioners, tunable radio frequency filters, compatible grating devices, and adaptive devices has become feasible. − Furthermore, the synergy between ferroelectricity and ferroelasticity can markedly enhance material physical properties. , For example, You et al reported a hybrid perovskite multiferroic [Me 3 NCH 2 Cl]CdCl 3 , whose illustrious electromechanical conversion performance has been proven to be closely related to the partial coupling of ferroelectricity and ferroelasticity. , Benefiting from the numerous advantages of intimate interplay between full ferroelectricity and full ferroelasticity, recently, a large amount of studies have focused on exploring multiferroic materials with ferroelectricity and ferroelasticity. − However, constructing ferroelectric that is compatible with ferroelasticity has been a great challenge due to the strict requirements of crystallographic symmetry, reasonable symmetry breaking, and ingenious evolution of lattice parameters. − …”