2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfa.2006.03.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A higher order analogue of the Carathéodory–Julia theorem

Abstract: A higher order analogue of the classical Carathéodory-Julia theorem on boundary derivatives is proved.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
45
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
(13 reference statements)
0
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using hypergeometric series we show that this sum is equal to ±2 n , where the choice of sign depends on r. We mention a recent and very interesting work of V. Bolotnikov and A. Kheifets [6] who obtained an analogue of the classical Carathéodory-Julia theorem on boundary derivatives. Using different techniques, the authors also obtained a condition which guarantees that we can write an analogue of formula (1.2) for the de Branges-Rovnyak spaces H(b).…”
mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Using hypergeometric series we show that this sum is equal to ±2 n , where the choice of sign depends on r. We mention a recent and very interesting work of V. Bolotnikov and A. Kheifets [6] who obtained an analogue of the classical Carathéodory-Julia theorem on boundary derivatives. Using different techniques, the authors also obtained a condition which guarantees that we can write an analogue of formula (1.2) for the de Branges-Rovnyak spaces H(b).…”
mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…We start with the classical Carathéodory-Julia theorem [7,9]. The following are equivalent: Higher order analogues of the above results have been presented in [3]. To recall them we first introduce some needed notations and definitions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that the structured matrix P w n (t 0 ) (which first appeared in [11]) is a higher order analogue of the product w 1 t 0 w * 0 . It turns out (and will be shown in this paper) that property (3) in Theorem 1.4 follows from a weaker assumption |w 0 (t 0 )| = 1 and P w n (t 0 ) = P w n (t 0 ) * , (1.17)…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations