2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10853-020-04654-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A highly accurate methodology for the prediction and correlation of mechanical properties based on the slimness ratio of additively manufactured tensile test specimens

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moura et al reported that the application of a miniaturized tensile specimen is reasonable when an insufficient amount of material is available or to reduce the costs of specimen production and testing. Nevertheless, the selection of the specimen geometry is crucial since the slimness ratio k, which is the relation between initial gauge length and specimen cross-sectional area, directly affects the elongation value [42]. The usability of the MTT technique to assess the mechanical properties of various structure states was previously demonstrated for conventionally and additively processed materials by Chvostova et al [40], Gotterbarm et al, and Džugan et al [43].…”
Section: Small Samples Design Testing Device and Strain Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moura et al reported that the application of a miniaturized tensile specimen is reasonable when an insufficient amount of material is available or to reduce the costs of specimen production and testing. Nevertheless, the selection of the specimen geometry is crucial since the slimness ratio k, which is the relation between initial gauge length and specimen cross-sectional area, directly affects the elongation value [42]. The usability of the MTT technique to assess the mechanical properties of various structure states was previously demonstrated for conventionally and additively processed materials by Chvostova et al [40], Gotterbarm et al, and Džugan et al [43].…”
Section: Small Samples Design Testing Device and Strain Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The application of MTT specimens was also presented by Melzer et al In this study, the sub-sized specimens were employed in order to investigate local mechanical properties of the interface of two different materials in a functionally graded block providing a deep insight into the location-and orientation-related properties [44]. The MTT was performed following the internal methodology RD 2/30 (accredited) according to the standard DIN EN ISO 6892-1/ASTM E8 [42]. All tensile tests (uniaxial and plane strain, Table 2, rows 1-5) were performed using an electromechanical universal testing machine LabControl with a load cell of 5 kN capacity.…”
Section: Small Samples Design Testing Device and Strain Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from the standard recommendations, practical considerations can also influence the decision to conduct customized tests, instead of relying solely on standardized ones, including the selection of specimen type. Specific practical needs drive these choices, as seen in cases where limited feedstock availability or research investigations of new formulations necessitate the use of non-standard subsize specimens [ 35 ]. Additionally, for costly materials, smaller samples than the prescribed size may be preferred, due to the destructive nature of tensile testing [ 35 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specific practical needs drive these choices, as seen in cases where limited feedstock availability or research investigations of new formulations necessitate the use of non-standard subsize specimens [ 35 ]. Additionally, for costly materials, smaller samples than the prescribed size may be preferred, due to the destructive nature of tensile testing [ 35 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, it is challenging to perform quasi-static and cyclic tests, which are a prerequisite for the successful application of these novel materials in their highly demanding fields of application [ 16 ]. The experimental testing is even more demanding when it is necessary to test matrix material of thin-walled or topologically complex structures, usually manufactured using L-PBF and EB-PBF [ 17 ]. In such cases, it is necessary to test specimens of smaller sizes, although standardized testing procedures for mechanical testing of AM parts are still unavailable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%