2014
DOI: 10.1109/tcsi.2014.2309811
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Highly-Efficient Multi-Band Multi-Mode All-Digital Quadrature Transmitter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Various trade-offs between resolution and clock rates have been used in digital to RF conversion (DRFC) approaches, embedding the DAC into the baseband to RF mixer. Examples are the 6-bit switched-capacitor (SC) I/Q sharing DRFC structure in [2] or the 13-bit RF power DAC in [3], which present significant conceptual differences, since [2] optimizes power efficiency using a low-resolution scheme, and [3] targets improved noise performance thanks to additional resolution and digital pre-distortion. In [4], a 10-bit currentsteering DAC is demonstrated and digital Delta-Sigma Modulators (ΔΣM) with mismatch shaping (MS) are used to reduce OOB emissions at a programmable duplex distance.…”
Section: A Speed Vs Resolution Trade-off In Digital Transmittersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various trade-offs between resolution and clock rates have been used in digital to RF conversion (DRFC) approaches, embedding the DAC into the baseband to RF mixer. Examples are the 6-bit switched-capacitor (SC) I/Q sharing DRFC structure in [2] or the 13-bit RF power DAC in [3], which present significant conceptual differences, since [2] optimizes power efficiency using a low-resolution scheme, and [3] targets improved noise performance thanks to additional resolution and digital pre-distortion. In [4], a 10-bit currentsteering DAC is demonstrated and digital Delta-Sigma Modulators (ΔΣM) with mismatch shaping (MS) are used to reduce OOB emissions at a programmable duplex distance.…”
Section: A Speed Vs Resolution Trade-off In Digital Transmittersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most stringent noise specifications are found for the GPS band around 1575 MHz, due to the low typical power level of the GPS signal (~ -125 dBm). This issue has been highlighted in [2], where a noise floor of -130 dBm/Hz is measured in the GPS band when transmitting an 802.11g 54 Mbps signal on Channel 1 with a power of 16.35 dBm. In addition, the same noise requirements apply to the GLONASS band around 1602 MHz (27 MHz away from GPS).…”
Section: A Out-of-band Noise Vs Multi-standard Coexistencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can be achieved by performing a final AND with the 2LO signal before the conversion cell [42]. Such an arrangement has the additional advantage to hide the skews between different data bits [45], since the transitions of all c P and c N signals take place during the low phase of 2LO. The differential encoding ensures nearly constant current flow from the power supply, thus eliminating signaldependent IR drop.…”
Section: Rf Front-endmentioning
confidence: 99%