“…The breakthrough in the preparation of synthetic Fe IV –oxido complexes came from the laboratories of Nam and Que, who reported the first crystallographically characterized Fe IV –oxido complex in [Fe IV (O)(TMC)(MeCN)] 2+ (TMC = tetramethylcyclam and MeCN = acetonitrile; Figure A) and later followed that with the structure of [Fe IV (O)(N4Py)] 2+ (N4Py = N , N -bis(2-pyridylmethyl)- N -bis(2-pyridyl)methylamine; Figure B). , The structural analyses of these complexes showed relatively short Fe–O bond lengths of 1.646(3) and 1.636(3) Å, which are indicative of Fe IV –oxido species. There have been numerous spectroscopic and computational studies on these complexes that corroborate their assignments as Fe IV species, but they both have spin ground states of S = 1, which differ from those found in proteins. ,, Nevertheless, these complexes serve as important contributions to the field, and there is now a library of over 100 examples of S = 1 Fe IV –oxido complexes in similar ligand frameworks. − They have been particularly useful in delineating the properties of the electronic structure and demonstrating how optical spectroscopy is a reliable spectroscopic handle for Fe IV –oxido complexes. The signature features of synthetic mononuclear Fe IV –oxido species are weak bands around 700–900 nm that are assigned to a d–d transition. , The energy of the d–d transition is sensitive to the primary coordination sphere around the Fe IV –oxido unit, to both the equatorial ligands within the N–ligand frameworks and the exogenous ligand trans to the oxido ligand. , …”