A histological study of non-ceramic hydroxyapatite as a bone graft substitute material in the vertical bone augmentation of the posterior mandible using an interpositional inlay technique: A split mouth evaluation

Bechara, Karen; Dottore, Alexandre M.; Kawakami, Paulo Yataro; Gehrke, Sérgio Alexandre; Coelho, Paulo G.; Piattelli, Adriano; Iezzi, Giovanna; Shibli, Jamil Awad

doi:10.1016/j.aanat.2015.07.004

Cited by 15 publications

(16 citation statements)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…These techniques include onlay/inlay bone grafting [6, 7], distraction osteogenesis [8], maxillary sinus augmentation [9], inferior alveolar nerve transposition [10], alveolar ridge split [11], and guided bone regeneration (GBR) with resorbable [12] and nonresorbable membranes, such as those in polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) [13] or titanium [14]. …”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Alveolar Ridge Reconstruction with Titanium Meshes and Simultaneous Implant Placement: A Retrospective, Multicenter Clinical Study

Gomes¹,

Freixas²,

Han³

et al. 2016

BioMed Research International

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective. To evaluate horizontal bone gain and implant survival and complication rates in patients treated with titanium meshes placed simultaneously with dental implants and fixed over them. Methods. Twenty-five patients treated with 40 implants and simultaneous guided bone regeneration with titanium meshes (i–Gen®, MegaGen, Gyeongbuk, Republic of Korea) were selected for inclusion in the present retrospective multicenter study. Primary outcomes were horizontal bone gain and implant survival; secondary outcomes were biological and prosthetic complications. Results. After the removal of titanium meshes, the CBCT evaluation revealed a mean horizontal bone gain of 3.67 mm (±0.89). The most frequent complications were mild postoperative edema (12/25 patients: 48%) and discomfort after surgery (10/25 patients: 40%); these complications were resolved within one week. Titanium mesh exposure occurred in 6 patients (6/25 : 24%): one of these suffered partial loss of the graft and another experienced complete graft loss and implant failure. An implant survival rate of 97.5% (implant-based) and a peri-implant marginal bone loss of 0.43 mm (±0.15) were recorded after 1 year. Conclusions. The horizontal ridge reconstruction with titanium meshes placed simultaneously with dental implants achieved predictable satisfactory results. Prospective randomized controlled trials on a larger sample of patients are required to validate these positive outcomes.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Alveolar Ridge Reconstruction with Titanium Meshes and Simultaneous Implant Placement: A Retrospective, Multicenter Clinical Study

Gomes¹,

Freixas²,

Han³

et al. 2016

BioMed Research International

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…(), and Bechara et al. () showed that segmental osteotomy associated with interposition bone grafts is a viable alternative compared to other surgical techniques for vertical bone augmentation. According to Bormann et al.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Osteoconductive biomaterials have increasingly been used to decrease allograft donor site morbidity (Cordaro et al 2008). Studies have compared the results of interposition grafts of biomaterials with autogenous bone (Felice et al 2009;Kawakami et al 2013) and using particulate graft on interpositional technic by Dottore et al (2014) and Bechara et al (2015). However, no reports were found comparing the results of interposition grafts exclusively with particulate biomaterials in the segmental osteotomy of atrophic mandibles.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Recent studies by Jensen (2006), Marchetti et al (2007), Felice et al (2009), Bormann et al (2010, Scarano et al (2011), Lopez-Cedrun (2011), Kawakami et al (2013), Dottore et al (2014), and Bechara et al (2015) showed that segmental osteotomy associated with interposition bone grafts is a viable alternative compared to other surgical techniques for vertical bone augmentation.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…() and Bechara et al. (). However, no reports were found comparing the results of interposition grafts exclusively with particulate biomaterials in the segmental osteotomy of atrophic mandibles.…”

mentioning

confidence: 98%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Vertical augmentation of the posterior atrophic mandible by interpositional grafts in a split‐mouth design: a human tomography evaluation pilot study

Domingues

Ribeiro

Horta

et al. 2016

Clinical Oral Implants Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite in regeneration of periodontal intrabony defects: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Shaikh

Zafar

Alnazzawi

et al. 2022

Annals of Anatomy - Anatomischer Anzeiger

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A histological study of non-ceramic hydroxyapatite as a bone graft substitute material in the vertical bone augmentation of the posterior mandible using an interpositional inlay technique: A split mouth evaluation

Cited by 15 publications

References 17 publications

Alveolar Ridge Reconstruction with Titanium Meshes and Simultaneous Implant Placement: A Retrospective, Multicenter Clinical Study

Alveolar Ridge Reconstruction with Titanium Meshes and Simultaneous Implant Placement: A Retrospective, Multicenter Clinical Study

Vertical augmentation of the posterior atrophic mandible by interpositional grafts in a split‐mouth design: a human tomography evaluation pilot study

Nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite in regeneration of periodontal intrabony defects: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About