2021
DOI: 10.1080/17451000.2021.1979236
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A histology-free description of Tetrastemma cupido sp. nov. (Nemertea: Eumonostilfera) from Sagami Bay, Japan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The value was comparable with the 5% barcoding gap commonly used to differentiate nemertean species (e.g. Hao et al 2015;Sundberg et al 2016;Kajihara et al 2018;Sagorny et al 2019;Hookabe et al 2020Hookabe et al , 2021Hookabe et al , 2022. The intraspecific COI divergence between a specimen collected from Tsuruga and another from Shimonoseki was 0.10% in uncorrected p-distance.…”
Section: Phylogeny and Genetic Distancesupporting
confidence: 70%
“…The value was comparable with the 5% barcoding gap commonly used to differentiate nemertean species (e.g. Hao et al 2015;Sundberg et al 2016;Kajihara et al 2018;Sagorny et al 2019;Hookabe et al 2020Hookabe et al , 2021Hookabe et al , 2022. The intraspecific COI divergence between a specimen collected from Tsuruga and another from Shimonoseki was 0.10% in uncorrected p-distance.…”
Section: Phylogeny and Genetic Distancesupporting
confidence: 70%
“…With the advent of molecular tools-DNA barcoding and molecular phylogeny-in monostiliferan systematics (e.g., Andrade et al, 2012;Kvist et al, 2014;Kvist et al, 2015;Leasi et al, 2016;Hookabe et al, 2020;Hookabe et al, 2021), we are now in a position to obtain a more accurate picture of the species diversity. Some of the diagnostic characters traditionally used in monostiliferan taxonomy are often ambiguous and thus need to be revisited with molecular phylogeny.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A histology-free description with DNA barcoding has been progressively introduced to nemertean systematics in the past decade (e.g., Kajihara 2015 ; Gonzalez-Cueto et al 2017 ; Simpson et al 2017 ; Kajihara et al 2018 , 2022 ; Chernyshev et al 2020 ; Hookabe et al 2021a , b ; Leiva et al 2021 ; Abato et al 2022 ). This approach has been applied to two cases, one of which is a description of species with internal characters interspecifically differentiated and observable without histology (e.g., number of proboscis branches in Gorgonorhynchus Dakin & Fordham, 1931 [ Kajihara 2015 ; Hookabe et al 2021a )].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the other case, especially when internal morphology is uniform between most species in a genus, a species description has been performed solely based on characters examined in-vivo (shape of head, body coloration and markings, number of eyes, blood color, and stylet apparatus) [e.g., Baseodiscus Diesing, 1850 ( Kajihara et al 2022 ) and Ototyphlonemertes Diesing, 1863 ( Kajihara et al 2018 )]. Recent descriptions of species in the genus Tetrastemma Ehrenberg, 1828, fitting the latter case, have been performed based on characters of living specimens without histological observations ( Chernyshev et al 2020 ; Hookabe et al 2021b ; Abato et al 2022 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%