A historical and ethnobotanical study on local botanical knowledge recorded in the book “Mongolia and Amdo and the Dead City of Khara-Khoto”

Abstract

Background There is a plentiful amount of local knowledge on plants hidden in the literature of foreign exploration to China in modern history. Mongolia and Amdo and the Dead City of Khara-Khoto (MAKK) is an expedition record on the sixth scientific expedition to northwestern China (1907–1909) initiated by P. K. Kozlov (1863–1935), a famous Russian Central Asian explorer. Used as a non-professional biology book, MAKK contains some botanical knowledge. The information noted down over more than 100 years ago is about the traditional knowledge of the Mongolian folks lived on the Mongolian plateau and the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau for the understanding and utilization of plants, which is of a highlighted function for the study of the botany and the history of science and technology. We therefore have carried on relevant collation, analysis, investigation and criticism to Mongolian local knowledge on plants in MAKK, and obtained the status quo of these local knowledge. Methods The authors used the literature research method to sort and compare the two versions of MAKK, separating out the Mongolian local knowledge about plant naming and utilization. Then, these contents were verified through literature textual method and were catalogued according to the method of ethnobotany. Based on these, the authors carried out field investigations along with Kozlov’s expedition routes in Alxa in 2019 and 2020, respectively. The methods of key informants interview, snowball sampling, and rational sampling were all used in field investigations. By analyzing the interview data of 34 key informants, we obtained the status quo of local knowledge recorded in MAKK. Results By means of regulation and research, it is found that Mongolian plant folk names of one genus and eight species were recorded in MAKK. Their morphological characteristics and traditional grazing knowledge are crucial naming basis. There are three types on the structures of Mongolian plant name: simple primary name, complex primary name, and secondary name. Corresponding relations between Mongolian folk name and scientific name are existed in “one-to-one,” “multitude-to-one,” and “one-to-multitude” forms. The classification of certain plants by Mongolian people has reached the level of species or varieties. In addition, the Mongols’ usage for nine species of plants was noted in MAKK. These plants are mainly used for edible, graziery, fuelwood, building material, toponym, and belief. With the development and change of the society, it is found that some utilization methods have been replaced or even disappeared, while the remainders still continue to be applied. Conclusions Firstly, the Mongols have indigenous rules and systems for nominating and classifying plants. Secondly, the Mongolian local knowledge on plants possesses multiform character. Thirdly, the Mongolian local knowledge on plants and Mongolian culture have mutual influence and interdependence relationship. Fourthly, the Mongolian local knowledge on plants urgently needs to be protected in many forms. Finally, it is veritable and reliable for the records of Mongolian botanical local knowledge in MAKK by textual research, and it is valuable for scientific research. The historical notes more than 100 years ago are not only supply dependable information and momentous historical data for Mongolian ethnobotany and Chinese minority science and technology history research, but also offer references for ecology, flora, and botanical history study.

Ethnobotanical study of sweet orange (Citrus sinensis) and mango (Mangifera indica L.) varieties in Nigeria

“…Ascertaining the origin and genetic diversity of these cultivated varieties will require genetic analyses, but the sampled communities were convinced about the importance of preserving the landraces they cultivated knowing that they had been passed down through many generations (Malik et al 2012;Ravishankar et al 2000;Rey et al 2006). The ethnobotanical surveys allow us to understand the relationship between human beings and plant species (Fatur 2019;Petran et al 2020;Liu et al 2021;Mulyanto et al 2023). We can infer indigenous knowledge of mango and sweet orange species based on their current utilization and benefits to people who cultivate and use them (Iwu 2002).…”

Ethnobotanical identification of mango (Mangifera indica L.) and other fruit trees mentioned in Old Javanese Ramayana (10th century Java, Indonesia)

“…The potential use of historical texts for ethnobotanical studies has generated renewed interest in the relationship between human and plants (Fatur 2019;Coimbra and Welch 2020;Petran et al 2020;Liu et al 2021). These texts are not only considered important as sources for obtaining information highlighting the relationship between the people of a particular area and their botanic environment in the past, but also demonstrate the continuity and change of traditional knowledge about plants (Pardo-de-Santayana et al 2007; Kalle and Soukand 2012;Castro et al 2013;Silva et al 2014;Herrero and Cardano 2015;Rahman et al 2019;Petran et al 2020;Ford 2020;Dafni et al 2021;Saraci and Damo 2021).…”

Ethnobotanical Analysis of Phytonyms and Plant-Related Glosses Mentioned in Bujangga Manik, a Pre-Islamic Sundanese Text (15th Century Java, Indonesia)

“…The recognition of the ever-changing nature of these interrelationships has sparked a renewed interest among ethnobotanists in exploring the historical anthropobotanical connections. This interest has been fueled by the prospect of using historical documents as valuable resources for conducting ethnobotanical studies (Castro et al, 2013;Silva et al, 2014;Alves & Ming, 2015;Fatur, 2019;Svanberg et al, 2019;Petran et al, 2020;Coimbra & Welch, 2020;Ford, 2020;Dafni et al, 2021;Liu et al, 2021;Saraci & Damo, 2021). The renewal of interest is generated because exploring information within historical documents promotes a chronological perspective on the development of plant usage.…”