2012
DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2011.2862
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Historical Perspective on Breast Cancer Activism in the United States: From Education and Support to Partnership in Scientific Research

Abstract: Breast cancer remained a hidden disease among women in the United States until the 20th century. It was initially brought into the open with public revelations from individual women, which was followed by the development of support groups and ultimately the formation of political activist groups with various priorities. Those concerned with toxic environmental exposures as a potential cause of breast cancer organized, demonstrated, and lobbied for research funding and eventually became partners in the research… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A suggested collaborative model that has proved successful in improving models of care in conditions such as breast cancer is community-based participatory research (CBPR), in which patient advocates, clinicians and researchers collaborate in the design of research [17]. One goal of a stakeholder forum might be the development of a community-based participatory research project to create surveys of patient priorities for care and research.…”
Section: Support Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A suggested collaborative model that has proved successful in improving models of care in conditions such as breast cancer is community-based participatory research (CBPR), in which patient advocates, clinicians and researchers collaborate in the design of research [17]. One goal of a stakeholder forum might be the development of a community-based participatory research project to create surveys of patient priorities for care and research.…”
Section: Support Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consistent financial and leadership support from academic and private sector institutions is currently lacking but desperately needed to overcome this lack of federal funding for research. Other disease-specific organizations, from breast cancer to suicide prevention, have been successful in raising public awareness and research funding [16,17]; gun violence prevention foundations could learn from this model to raise the financial resources needed to attract research interest and proposals, to motivate communities to stand in solidarity to address this public health crisis, and to help initiate collaborative research teams in hospitals, clinics, and communities around the country. Without reliable funding, motivated investigators will continue to be unable to build careers dedicated to gun violence prevention research.…”
Section: Gun Violence: a Politicized Public Health Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each partner is empowered through bi-directional learning, and equipped with the necessary tools to implement changes and to document the efforts, successes, and lessons learned. Thus, carefully-executed CER benefits both researchers and the community under study by targeting the appropriate health determinants [60] enabling the translation of science into practice [10, 61] and, hence, addresses health disparities [58, 62]. …”
Section: National Advocacy: “Public Interest Advocacy”mentioning
confidence: 99%