A History of Contemporary Political Economy and Postmodernism

Abstract

The study of the history of economic theory is entwined with nonneoclassical and especially Marxist political economic analyses, which relate the creation of an autonomous science of economic relations to the establishment of capitalism. Usually, the main agents in this interaction are social groups and especially social classes. Contrarily, neoclassical orthodoxy understands the history of economic theory as mere history of economic thought, a succession of personal contributions with limited relation to socioeconomic conditions. The relation between economy and economic theory is theorized through an asocial perspective, because social classes and politics are excluded and methodological individualism reigns. Recent postmodernist interpretations advance a historicist, relativist, politicist view. The reasons for creating an autonomous science of economic relations are to be found not in socioeconomic relations but mainly in the field of the political. This article criticizes postmodernist interpretations from a Marxist perspective, rejecting them as historically unfounded and analytically infertile. JEL classification: B000; B41; B50

Temporary versus Permanent

“…The symbolization of time (Tabboni, 2001) is produced by continuity even when incapacity is involved. The historical structure (Braudel, 1972(Braudel, , 1985, the grand structure (Mavroudeas, 2006;Groom, 2007), remained visible, detectable. Permitting the declaration of 'temporary incapacity' has thus prevented any upheaval in the centres of power.…”