A HISTORY OF OUR UNDERSTANDING OF MAGMATIC Ni-Cu SULFIDE DEPOSITS

Abstract

Progress in the understanding of the origins of magmatic Ni-Cu sulfide deposits underwent a major acceleration with the advent of the 1960s. Prior to this decade, thinking had largely been influenced by observations on the Sudbury area, in Ontario, which was by far the dominant Ni producer. Discussion focused on the nature of the Sudbury Igneous Complex, and whether the ores were gravitational segregates from the complex, or whether they had been introduced by hot aqueous fluids. During the 1960s, the concept that Sudbury is an astrobleme was first proposed, the discovery of the Talnakh ore junction (Russia) elevated Noril'sk from minor to major status, and a new class of deposit related to komatiitic volcanism was recognized at Kambalda (Australia). The 1960s were also a turning point with respect to research funding, which led to an explosion both in the amount of research conducted, and in its global nature. Thereafter, progress was stimulated by the new thinking about Sudbury, and the very different environments of ore deposition observed at Noril'sk and Kambalda. It has turned out that a number of broad themes have evolved under which much of the progress over the past 40 years can be grouped. (i) Magmas rising directly from the mantle are unlikely to reach crustal depths saturated in sulfide, and contamination with crustal rocks is required for sulfide immiscibility to occur early in the crystallization process. (ii) With appropriate experimentally derived partition-coefficients, the relationship between the compositions of magma and sulfide can be modeled, and this modeling provides important constraints on geologically based hypotheses. (iii) The development of sulfide immiscibility commonly leaves a mark on the composition of the source magma and the rocks crystallizing from it that can act as a signpost for exploration. (iv) Sudbury is unique, probably because of the high degree of superheat that it experienced; sulfides have settled and accumulated over much of the base of the complex; in most other deposits, it has been the flow of magma carrying immiscible sulfides that has caused the sulfides to concentrate in economically exploitable proportions. The physical environment represented by a given part of an igneous body is therefore important when considering its potential. (v) Once concentrated, sulfide magmas cool and fractionate, and the fractionated residual liquid may migrate away from the initial site of crystallization to form rich concentrations of Cu, Pt, Pd and Au elsewhere. Observations at Voisey's Bay (Canada) over the past 10 years have confirmed the importance of these five themes.Du point de vue des connaissances à propos de l'origine des gisements magmatiques de sulfures de Ni-Cu, il y a eu des progrès importants au cours des années soixante. Avant cette époque, les interprétations ont été fortement influencées par les observations faites à Sudbury (Ontario), camp minier ayant alors la production la plus élevée en Ni. La discussion portait sur la nature du complexe igné de Sudbury, et ...

Fault-mediated melt ascent in a Neoproterozoic continental flood basalt province, the Franklin sills, Victoria Island, Canada

“…10C). In terms of Ni-sulfi de exploration Li et al, 2001;Naldrett, 2005), the most favorable locations for deposit formation would be just below the junction with the transfer conduit ("I" in Fig. 10C, an entrapment zone), or where the fast-moving magma entered a more quiescent upper sill ("j" in Fig.…”

Igneous Rock Associations 18. Transition Metals in Oceanic Island Basalt: Relationships with the Mantle Components

“…sulphur fugacity) may have impacted deposit formation (e.g. Lee 1996;Naldrett 2005;Mungall and Naldrett 2008). They are noritic (Kerrich et al 2005) and bear extreme EM1-like Ba/La and Rb/Ba signatures (Zhang et al 2008;Said and Kerrich 2010;Greenough et al 2011) that contrast with uneconomic intrusions bearing HIMU and EM2 signatures (Zhang et al 2008).…”

The mineral system approach applied to magmatic Ni–Cu–PGE sulphide deposits

“…The mineral system approach considers the origin of these deposits in the framework of lithospheric-scale processes from the time-honoured perspective of source, fluids, transport and traps. This approach has been applied over many decades in studies of Ni-Cu-PGE sulphide deposits, particular in a series of papers and books by Naldrett (Naldrett, 1989, 1997, 1999c, Naldrett, 2004a, Naldrett, 2005, 2010b, a, Naldrett, 2011, although the terminology has evolved over the years. In essence the approach involves a broader perspective than forensic studies focusing solely on the deposits themselves.…”