2015
DOI: 10.1007/s11999-015-4174-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A History of Treated Periprosthetic Joint Infection Increases the Risk of Subsequent Different Site Infection

Abstract: Background After the successful treatment of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), patients may present with degenerative joint disease in another joint with symptoms severe enough to warrant arthroplasty. However, it is not known whether patients with a history of treated PJI at one site will have an increased risk of PJI in the second arthroplasty site.Questions/purposes The primary objective of this study is to determine if there is a difference in the risk of developing a PJI after a second total hip arthr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…25,28 Patients with a history of PJI had a greater risk of developing PJI in a subsequent THA or TKA. 29 In 2011, the Musculoskeletal Infection Society proposed a unique set of PJI criteria, which were later revised at the International Consensus Meeting (ICM) on PJI. The diagnosis of PJI can be established if one of the following three major criteria occurs: two positive periprosthetic cultures with identical organisms; a sinus tract communicating with the joint; having three of the following minor criteria: (a) elevated serum C-reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), (b) elevated synovial fluid white blood cell (WBC) count, (c) elevated synovial fluid polymorphonuclear neutrophil percentage, (d) positive histological analysis of periprosthetic tissue, and (e) a single positive culture of periprosthetic tissue or fluid.…”
Section: Pathophysiology Of Periprosthetic Joint Infectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…25,28 Patients with a history of PJI had a greater risk of developing PJI in a subsequent THA or TKA. 29 In 2011, the Musculoskeletal Infection Society proposed a unique set of PJI criteria, which were later revised at the International Consensus Meeting (ICM) on PJI. The diagnosis of PJI can be established if one of the following three major criteria occurs: two positive periprosthetic cultures with identical organisms; a sinus tract communicating with the joint; having three of the following minor criteria: (a) elevated serum C-reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), (b) elevated synovial fluid white blood cell (WBC) count, (c) elevated synovial fluid polymorphonuclear neutrophil percentage, (d) positive histological analysis of periprosthetic tissue, and (e) a single positive culture of periprosthetic tissue or fluid.…”
Section: Pathophysiology Of Periprosthetic Joint Infectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the likelihood of undiagnosed PJIs, the exact number of PJI‐related revisions is unclear. Importantly, however, known PJI‐related revisions are more costly and time consuming than others, and increase the probability of poor prognosis (e.g., limb salvage operations or PJI recurrence) . Therefore, recognizing the unique biological characteristics of relevant microbial organisms and their infection‐causing mechanisms are of utmost importance for both preventing and treating PJIs.…”
Section: Etiology Of Prosthetic Joint Infectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, PJI leads to implant removal and long-term antibiotic therapy with a permanent, increased risk for PJI development in affected patients [3]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%