2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.comcom.2017.12.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A hop-by-hop dynamic distributed multipath routing mechanism for link state network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dynamic multiplexing protocol algorithm (DMPA) is a connection‐level network router for each target node to calculate the next hop count 16 . A shortcut path layout has to be created based on the default network connection state and according to the powerful network‐level algorithm, shooting ineffective mode enhances efficiency upgrade.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dynamic multiplexing protocol algorithm (DMPA) is a connection‐level network router for each target node to calculate the next hop count 16 . A shortcut path layout has to be created based on the default network connection state and according to the powerful network‐level algorithm, shooting ineffective mode enhances efficiency upgrade.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FIFR++ approach [24] employ progressive link metric increments in conjunction with FIFR and proves that FIFR++ is loop-free while protecting against single link failures. Authors in [25] present DMPA-e by incorporating hop count, a topology dependent metric. However, DMPA-e cannot achieve full failure coverage against single network component failures.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As our main motivation of this paper is to achieve good computational efficiency and high network availability, the objective Average Degree of The Topology of our performance evaluation is twofold: i) To indicate the effectiveness of MNP-e, we compare MNPe with the standard OSPF and some cooperation-free mechanisms mentioned in Section II, including LFC [12], TBFH [17], MNP and DMPA-e [25]. The time complexity of other schemes mentioned in the related works are much more complex, so they are not compared here.…”
Section: Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%