2017
DOI: 10.4064/cm6457-8-2016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Hopf type theorem for equivariant local maps

Abstract: We study otopy classes of equivariant local maps and prove the Hopf type theorem for such maps in the case of a real finite dimensional orthogonal representation of a compact Lie group.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

3
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Observe that p i : E i → M i is a vector bundle such that rank E i = dim M i and E i is orientable as a manifold. Following tom Dieck (1979) and Bartłomiejczyk (2017), we define a function θ i :…”
Section: Equivariant Maps and Local Cross Sectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Observe that p i : E i → M i is a vector bundle such that rank E i = dim M i and E i is orientable as a manifold. Following tom Dieck (1979) and Bartłomiejczyk (2017), we define a function θ i :…”
Section: Equivariant Maps and Local Cross Sectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In papers [1,2,6] the authors introduce the equivariant degree deg G : C G (V) → A(G) for the action of a compact Lie group G and prove that the degree has the following expected properties.…”
Section: Degree Deg Gmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the above we used two properties of the classical topological degree: the product formula (1) and the localization of zeros (2).…”
Section: Thus We Getmentioning
confidence: 99%

Degree product formula in the case of a finite group action

Bartłomiejczyk,
Kamedulski,
Nowak-Przygodzki
2018
Preprint
Self Cite
“…Remark 6.4. A more thorough description of F G [Ω] based on the formula (6.1) and the detailed analysis of the factors F W H [Ω H ] is given in [3], which continues and develops the approach presented here.…”
Section: Proof We Have To Show That Ifmentioning
confidence: 99%