2022
DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2022.840.1941
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A huge undescribed diversity of the subgenus Hystricochaetonotus (Gastrotricha, Chaetonotidae, Chaetonotus) in Central Europe

Abstract: The subgenus Hystricochaetonotus Schwank, 1990 is one of the most species-rich subgenera of Chaetonotus Ehrenberg, 1830. It has a worldwide distribution and encompasses 37 species predominantly living in the benthos and periphyton of limnetic habitats. We have discovered further nine new species in running and stagnant waters in Slovakia (Central Europe): Ch. (H.) arcanus sp. nov., Ch. (H.) avarus sp. nov., Ch. (H.) gulosus sp. nov., Ch. (H.) iratus sp. nov., Ch. (H.) luxus sp. nov., Ch. (H.) mirabilis sp. nov… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, according to the systematics presented on the GWP (Todaro & Tongiorgi 2023), Hystricochaetonotus is still considered a subgenus of genus Chaetonotus and Lepidochaetus still considered a genus rather than a subgenus. Furthermore, recent comprehensive molecular phylogenetic studies demonstrate the monophyly of Lepidochaetus, being quite separate from other species of Chaetonotus (Križanová & Vd'ačný 2021, Križanová & Vďačný 2022) and a monophyletic Hystricochaetonotus (Križanová & Vďačný 2022) each time with a maximum statistic node support. In the present publication we therefore follow the current taxonomy according to the GWP with, a subgenus status for Hystricochaetonotus and a genus status for Lepidochaetus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, according to the systematics presented on the GWP (Todaro & Tongiorgi 2023), Hystricochaetonotus is still considered a subgenus of genus Chaetonotus and Lepidochaetus still considered a genus rather than a subgenus. Furthermore, recent comprehensive molecular phylogenetic studies demonstrate the monophyly of Lepidochaetus, being quite separate from other species of Chaetonotus (Križanová & Vd'ačný 2021, Križanová & Vďačný 2022) and a monophyletic Hystricochaetonotus (Križanová & Vďačný 2022) each time with a maximum statistic node support. In the present publication we therefore follow the current taxonomy according to the GWP with, a subgenus status for Hystricochaetonotus and a genus status for Lepidochaetus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, further new species were described from freshwater biotopes in central Europe (e.g. Križanová & Vďačný 2021, Križanová & Vďačný 2022 and therefore there may be around 260 species recorded from this continent. Compared to this number, 47 species records for the whole of France most likely do not reflect the true diversity present.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It would also be interesting to screen out genetically disjunct populations of widely distributed species in order to confirm the status of these taxa or, conversely, establish whether they are reproductively isolated but morphologically indistinguishable populations, thus identifying phenomena of cryptic or pseudo-cryptic speciation [58].…”
Section: Gastrotrichsmentioning
confidence: 99%