2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.12.17.423313
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A human coronavirus evolves antigenically to escape antibody immunity

Abstract: There is intense interest in antibody immunity to coronaviruses. However, it is unknown if coronaviruses evolve to escape such immunity, and if so, how rapidly. Here we address this question by characterizing the historical evolution of human coronavirus 229E. We identify human sera from the 1980s and 1990s that have neutralizing titers against contemporaneous 229E that are comparable to the anti-SARS-CoV-2 titers induced by SARS-CoV-2 infection or vaccination. We test these sera against 229E strains isolated … Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
66
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 94 publications
(145 reference statements)
0
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We speculate that these mutations emerged in response to immune selection in individuals with non-sterilizing immunity. What the long-term effect of accumulation of mutations on the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic will be is not known, but the common cold coronavirus HCoV-229E evolves antigenic variants that are comparatively resistant to the older sera but remain sensitive to contemporaneous sera 50 . Thus, it is possible that these mutations and others that emerge in individuals with suboptimal or waning immunity will erode the effectiveness of natural and vaccine elicited immunity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We speculate that these mutations emerged in response to immune selection in individuals with non-sterilizing immunity. What the long-term effect of accumulation of mutations on the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic will be is not known, but the common cold coronavirus HCoV-229E evolves antigenic variants that are comparatively resistant to the older sera but remain sensitive to contemporaneous sera 50 . Thus, it is possible that these mutations and others that emerge in individuals with suboptimal or waning immunity will erode the effectiveness of natural and vaccine elicited immunity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More broadly, our maps suggest that it may be advisable to more systematically consider possible escape mutations when devising antibodies for clinical use against SARS-CoV-2. It is now clear that human coronaviruses undergo antigenic evolution in response to immune pressure [26,27], and we and others have begun to map out the key sites in the RBD that are targeted by human antibody immunity [19,2830]. The recent rise in frequency of mutations at site E484 suggests that this immunity may be beginning to drive antigenic variation within immunodominant positions in the RBD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neutralizing antibodies against the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) spike are associated with protection against infection in both humans (Addetia et al, 2020;Lumley et al, 2020) and animals (Alsoussi et al, 2020;Walls et al, 2020;Zost et al, 2020a). However, other human coronaviruses undergo antigenic evolution that erodes neutralizing antibody immunity (Eguia et al, 2020). This antigenic evolution is driven by positive selection for mutations in the viral spike, particularly in regions involved in receptor binding (Kistler and Bedford, 2021;Wong et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%