1963
DOI: 10.1038/198596a0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Human ‘D-like’ Antibody

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
1
1

Year Published

1973
1973
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
21
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Tests on 10,025 Finnish donors show the antithetical relationship of anti-Nea (proposed name anti-LWb) and anti-LW made by LW3 people (proposed name anti-LWa). Tests on families of previously reported LW3 propositi and of LW(a-b+) Finnish donors support the hypothesis that Ne* (L Wh) is an allele at the L W locus which when homozygous produces the phenotype once [5][6][7]. The history and notation of LW is complex since the rare LW-negative pheno type can reflect a true genetical state or a transient acquired condition found during illness and antibody formation [for reviews see references 8-10].…”
mentioning
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Tests on 10,025 Finnish donors show the antithetical relationship of anti-Nea (proposed name anti-LWb) and anti-LW made by LW3 people (proposed name anti-LWa). Tests on families of previously reported LW3 propositi and of LW(a-b+) Finnish donors support the hypothesis that Ne* (L Wh) is an allele at the L W locus which when homozygous produces the phenotype once [5][6][7]. The history and notation of LW is complex since the rare LW-negative pheno type can reflect a true genetical state or a transient acquired condition found during illness and antibody formation [for reviews see references 8-10].…”
mentioning
confidence: 62%
“…The first clue to a difference between the two antibodies was observed by Fisk and Foord [3] in 1942, who found that the cells of all newborn babies, whether Rh positive or negative as defined by human anti-Rh, were positive with guin ea-pig anti-Rh. Subsequent work, initiated by Murray and Clark [4] [5][6][7]. The history and notation of LW is complex since the rare LW-negative pheno type can reflect a true genetical state or a transient acquired condition found during illness and antibody formation [for reviews see references [8][9][10].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But it was in 1962 that Levine et al [8] found the first human blood sample that failed to react with that antibody, and the following year, Levine et al [9] discovered the first two cases of anti-LW in D-positive individuals. A further case of anti-LW was then reported by Swanson and Matson [20] in 1964.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only after 1963 Levine et al 8 proposed that the heteroantibody of rabbits should be named anti-LW (a tribute to Landsteiner and Wiener) and the human should be named anti-D. The Rh name resulted from the LW antigen.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%