2013
DOI: 10.1080/00207160.2013.800194
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A human ear recognition method using nonlinear curvelet feature subspace

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These algorithms allow for partial matching and are robust to partial occlusion because they only operate on keypoints, but global ear structure information is discarded. Other local techniques densely calculate the local descriptors of the entire image, such as wavelet [34], curvelet [35], Gabor filters [36], log-Gabor filters [37], local binary patterns [38], and histogram oriented gradients [39].…”
Section: A Ear Recognition Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These algorithms allow for partial matching and are robust to partial occlusion because they only operate on keypoints, but global ear structure information is discarded. Other local techniques densely calculate the local descriptors of the entire image, such as wavelet [34], curvelet [35], Gabor filters [36], log-Gabor filters [37], local binary patterns [38], and histogram oriented gradients [39].…”
Section: A Ear Recognition Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the performance of DMS-BSIF is lower than the feature used in Omara et al (2016) for IITD-1 database. As the ear consists of several geometric structures such as curvatures, the proposed approaches of Basit and Shoaib (2014) and Omara et al (2016) based on geometric measurements give interesting results in terms of accuracy.…”
Section: Experiments #3mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their dimensions are then reduced using the Laplacian eigenmaps method. Basit and Shoaib (2014) used the wrapping technique based on a fast discrete curvelet transform (FDCT) to extract the invariant feature scale and orientation vectors. Each feature vector is then computed from eight directions, containing also two coefficients, which are: the approximate curvelet coefficient and its second-coarsest level.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results indicate that the LBP descriptor does not achieve good results with smaller scale sizes, and that level-3 of the spatial pyramid division provides the best recognition rates with all the descriptors. As mentioned in Section 5, the [32] one-dimensional quadrature filter Hamming distance 94.72 2D quadrature filter Hamming distance 96.08 Kumer [33] sparse representation of local grey-level orientations sparse representation 97.73 Mamta [34] traditional principal component analysis inner product classifier (IPC) 79 local principal independent components inner product classifier (IPC) 97.2 Basit [35] nonlinear Table 6 Summary of related and recent work on personal identification using two-dimensional palmprint images References Feature extraction Recognition rate…”
Section: Experiments #2mentioning
confidence: 99%