T cell receptor-transgenic F5 mice were used to assess primary CD8 + T cell responses to a modified virus Ankara (MVA)-vectored vaccine in the absence of CD4 + T cell help. Naive, CD8-enriched, CFSE-labelled F5 cells were transferred into normal or CD4 + celldepleted mice and the mice were vaccinated with MVA.HIVA-NP. At different time points during the primary response, F5 cells were re-isolated and analysed on divisional basis for a number of parameters. We demonstrated that the primary CD8 + T cell response in the absence of CD4 + T cell help differed from that in normal CD4 + cellundepleted mice. While in the absence of CD4 + T cell help, the initial migratory progress from the local response to a systemic one was not grossly affected, the proportion of dying F5 cells during the expansion phase was markedly increased and resulted in an overall smaller expansion and significantly decreased frequency of CD8 + T cell memory after contraction. T cells primed without help displayed accelerated proliferation and activation, while expression of interferon-c remained similar. These phenomena were observed in the lymph nodes draining the MVA.HIVA-NP immunization site and were similar, but delayed by 2-3 days in spleen and non-draining lymph nodes.
IntroductionCD8 + T cells form an important part of the immune defence against many intracellular pathogens including viruses. Historically, CD8 + T cell responses against viral infections were considered to be independent from 'help' provided by CD4 + T cells. This was explained by direct activation of antigen-presenting DC by viruses, which provided ligands for Toll-like receptors and proinflammatory signals [1][2][3]. Recently, this view was revised by studies of non-inflammatory antigens which suggested that while primary CD8 + T cell response was CD4 + T cell-independent, secondary CD8 + T cell response, i.e. development of functional memory, was dependent on CD4 + T cell help during priming. These data led to the formulation of a programming model [4][5][6]. In contrast, another set of recent studies pointed towards an environmental model and proposed that CD4 + T cells were required to enhance survival of fully functional memory CD8 + T cells rather than imparting essential programming during the primary response [7,8]. The differences in these conclusions may be explained by the use of different antigens and immunization protocols, which might lead to differential activation of DC. Collectively, these and other experiments [9][10][11][12][13] not required for triggering the CD8 + T cell program of multiple cell divisions, effector function maturation and cell number contraction, but was needed for differentiation into functional CD8 + T cell memory and/or its maintenance.To date, most studies investigated secondary responses to make conclusions about the dependence of the CD8 + T cell responses on CD4 help. This is partially because induction of a good memory is the ultimate aim of a successful vaccination, but also because primary CD8 + T cell responses to non-inf...