2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2019.05.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A hybrid analytical-numerical method for solving advection-dispersion problems on a half-line

Abstract: This paper employs the unied transform, also known as the Fokas method, to solve the advection-dispersion equation on the half-line. This method combines complex analysis with numerics. Compared to classical approaches used to solve linear partial dierential equations (PDEs), the unied transform avoids the

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Through parameterization of the contours, these explicit solutions can be numerically evaluated. [15][16][17] The application of the UTM is systematic, regardless of the types of boundary data, e.g., nonhomogeneous Dirichlet, Neumann, and Robin conditions. This is one reason the UTM is more general and effective than standard methods for evolution IBVPs.…”
Section: The Continuous Utmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Through parameterization of the contours, these explicit solutions can be numerically evaluated. [15][16][17] The application of the UTM is systematic, regardless of the types of boundary data, e.g., nonhomogeneous Dirichlet, Neumann, and Robin conditions. This is one reason the UTM is more general and effective than standard methods for evolution IBVPs.…”
Section: The Continuous Utmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The exact (continuous) solution is given by 𝑞(đ‘„, 𝑇) = 𝜙(đ‘„ + 𝑇), while the semidiscrete solution is obtained from the representation (17) with the standard forward discretization stencil. Figure 3 shows the semidiscrete solution 𝑞 𝑛 (𝑇) (left panel) and a log-log error plot (right panel) of the ∞-norm of 𝑞 𝑛 (0.5) − 𝑞(đ‘„ 𝑛 , 0.5), as a function of ℎ.…”
Section: Forward Discretization Of 𝒒 𝒕 = 𝒄 𝒒 𝒙mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, little work has been conducted to analytically solve the above complicated model for the transient solute dispersion in submerged vegetated flows, due to the difficulty resulted from the spatial variation of the vertical turbulent diffusion coefficient. Although the hybrid numerical-analytical method of Generalized Integral Transform Technique (Cotta, 1993) has been widely used to model solute transport in river and channel flows with nonuniform velocity profile and any forms of turbulent diffusivity (de Barros & Cotta, 2007;de Barros et al, 2006de Barros et al, , 2019Cotta et al, 2001Cotta et al, , 2013, its application to the submerged vegetated flows for 10.1029/2019WR025586 an instantaneous release has not been illustrated and the basic characteristics of the dispersion process for solute transport in the submerged vegetated flow has not ever discussed. Although numerical methods can give good solutions for solute transport in submerged vegetated flows, they are generally computationally expensive.…”
Section: 1029/2019wr025586mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, many researchers are more prefer to the numerical method to solve. Special for the advectiondispersion model, some numerical methods were developed such as random lattice Boltzmann method [10], Haar wavelets coupled with finite differences [11], unified transform/Fokas method [12], a numerical method based on Legendre scaling functions [13] and many more. Each of these methods had some superiority and weakness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%