2005 International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks (DSN'05)
DOI: 10.1109/dsn.2005.8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Hybrid and Adaptive Model for Fault-Tolerant Distributed Computing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Jiménez et al [25] proved that a failure detector class with weak completeness can be implemented only if every process knows the identity of the rest of processes in redundant computing. The influence of processing speed and message delay in redundant computing has been investigated by Raynal et al [19]. In [26], Junqueira and Marzullo proposed a framework which considers correlated failures for the design of distributed algorithms, and they used replication predicates to express process replication constraints.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jiménez et al [25] proved that a failure detector class with weak completeness can be implemented only if every process knows the identity of the rest of processes in redundant computing. The influence of processing speed and message delay in redundant computing has been investigated by Raynal et al [19]. In [26], Junqueira and Marzullo proposed a framework which considers correlated failures for the design of distributed algorithms, and they used replication predicates to express process replication constraints.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed system has been implemented in JAVA and tested over a set of networked LINUX workstations, equipped with QoS capabilities. More details of this implementation can be found elsewhere [15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proofs for the uniform agreement and termination properties, given by Theorems 1 and 2, respectively, follow. The proof for validity is omitted here due to space limitations, and can be found elsewhere [15]. Lemma 1.…”
Section: Correctness Proofmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation