2022
DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.834959
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Hybrid Brain-Computer Interface Based on Visual Evoked Potential and Pupillary Response

Abstract: Brain-computer interface (BCI) based on steady-state visual evoked potential (SSVEP) has been widely studied due to the high information transfer rate (ITR), little user training, and wide subject applicability. However, there are also disadvantages such as visual discomfort and “BCI illiteracy.” To address these problems, this study proposes to use low-frequency stimulations (12 classes, 0.8–2.12 Hz with an interval of 0.12 Hz), which can simultaneously elicit visual evoked potential (VEP) and pupillary respo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, a CCA-based spatial filter can be obtained and then the 8-channel data were processed by the CCA-based spatial filter. Lastly, the amplitude spectrum y(f) was calculated by fast Fourier Transform (FFT), and the SNR in decibels (dB) was defined as the ratio of y(f) to the mean value of the eight neighboring frequencies [40]. The flow chart of the calculation process is shown in Figure 3.…”
Section: G Bci Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, a CCA-based spatial filter can be obtained and then the 8-channel data were processed by the CCA-based spatial filter. Lastly, the amplitude spectrum y(f) was calculated by fast Fourier Transform (FFT), and the SNR in decibels (dB) was defined as the ratio of y(f) to the mean value of the eight neighboring frequencies [40]. The flow chart of the calculation process is shown in Figure 3.…”
Section: G Bci Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the study to create a hybrid BCI (h-BCI) system, the authors used low-frequency stimulation (12 sessions, 0.8–2.12 Hz with an interval of 0.12 Hz), which evokes visual evoked potential (f-VEP) and pupillary reflex (PR) ( Jiang et al, 2022 ). The final hybrid accuracy was obtained using a decision fusion method to combine VEP and PR information.…”
Section: Paradigms Of Spellers: Bci-p300 Bci-mi and Bci-ssvepmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such effects can be reduced with high frequency stimulation paradigms ( Sakurada et al, 2015 ) but high frequency stimulation can in turn reduce BCI performance ( Volosyak et al, 2011 ). Other methods like amplitude modulated signals ( Chang et al, 2014 ) or specific low frequency signals ( Jiang et al, 2022 ) have been reported to increase user experience as well. In addition, we have previously shown that FM stimulation signals with a high carrier frequency are less perceptible ( Dreyer and Herrmann, 2015 ) and more comfortable ( Dreyer et al, 2017 ) than traditionally used stimulation signals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%