2023 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) 2023
DOI: 10.1109/icra48891.2023.10161045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Hybrid Cable-Driven Robot for Non-Destructive Leafy Plant Monitoring and Mass Estimation using Structure from Motion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tomato, as a significant vegetable crop, relies on an accurate assessment of fruit ripeness, which is crucial for determining tomato quality and optimizing harvest yields [1][2][3][4][5] . This research indicates that non-destructive methods for evaluating fruit ripeness have become a prominent area of study in precision agriculture within controlled environments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tomato, as a significant vegetable crop, relies on an accurate assessment of fruit ripeness, which is crucial for determining tomato quality and optimizing harvest yields [1][2][3][4][5] . This research indicates that non-destructive methods for evaluating fruit ripeness have become a prominent area of study in precision agriculture within controlled environments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned, each of these folds is evaluated by using two separate performance indexes-coefficient of determination R 2 and mean absolute percentage error MAPE. These values were selected because they are commonly used in the evaluation of regression models, with R 2 evaluating how well the predicted data follow the trends of the original data across different outputs [38,39], and MAPE defines the absolute difference between the predicted data and the real data across different inputs [40,41]. These two values are utilized because individually they may not provide a good picture of model performance-e.g., a model that has a good variance prediction but a large error will have a good R 2 and a poor MAPE, while the model which follows the data closely, but without taking the trends across inputs into account will demonstrate the opposite.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%