2020
DOI: 10.3390/su12229490
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Hybrid Deep Learning Model and Comparison for Wind Power Forecasting Considering Temporal-Spatial Feature Extraction

Abstract: The inherent intermittency and uncertainty of wind power have brought challenges in accurate wind power output forecasting, which also cause tricky problems in the integration of wind power to the grid. In this paper, a hybrid deep learning model bidirectional long short term memory-convolutional neural network (BiLSTM-CNN) is proposed for short-term wind power forecasting. First, the grey correlation analysis is utilized to select the inputs for forecasting model; Then, the proposed hybrid model extracts mult… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent papers addressing wind power forecasts could be broadly classified into 5 categories: papers focused on how to increase NWP accuracy [4][5][6][7][8], good-practice prediction guidelines [9][10][11], comparisons of accuracy across prediction models [12][13][14][15], hybrid and ensemble methods [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27], and conventional methods improved by, among other things, preprocessing [28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35]. At this point, clear distinction should be made between hybrid, ensemble and improved models.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Recent papers addressing wind power forecasts could be broadly classified into 5 categories: papers focused on how to increase NWP accuracy [4][5][6][7][8], good-practice prediction guidelines [9][10][11], comparisons of accuracy across prediction models [12][13][14][15], hybrid and ensemble methods [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27], and conventional methods improved by, among other things, preprocessing [28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35]. At this point, clear distinction should be made between hybrid, ensemble and improved models.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hybridization [16][17][18][19][20][21] and parallelization [22][23][24][25][26][27] of prediction models use datarefining and error compensation, respectively, as an approach to maximize prediction accuracy. The most common bases for hybrid models in recent literature are ANNs [17][18][19]21] due to their generalization ability, while the most common hybrid add ons would be single optimization methods [16,18,20,21]. With varying implementation, error reduction can be achieved in different ways.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To the best of our knowledge, no previous study attempted to investigate the potential of using BiLSTM for ST prediction. There are no intelligent algorithms or models that are competent for all problems, and deep learning models cannot be spared as well (Zhen et al 2020). There is still room for the improvement of deep learning models in ST forecasting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data preprocessing method is selected for noise reduction preprocessing before bus load curve prediction in order to obtain more stable prediction results. In reference [17], the bidirectional long-term and short-term memory (Bi-LSTM) network is used to predict the bus load sequence, which effectively improves the learning ability of the network to historical data. However, with the combination prediction model dividing the complete sequence into multiple subsequences, not all sequences are suitable for bidirectional training.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%