MILCOM 2005 - 2005 IEEE Military Communications Conference 2005
DOI: 10.1109/milcom.2005.1606078
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A hybrid end-to-end QOS architecture for heterogeneous networks (like the global information grid)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In MAAG, each application has an Importance Level (IL) defined by organizational policy and can assumed as QoS class of the application [7] . Table 2 depicts steps of negotiation, scheduling and reservation in an AMA.…”
Section: D) Application Main Agent (Ama)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In MAAG, each application has an Importance Level (IL) defined by organizational policy and can assumed as QoS class of the application [7] . Table 2 depicts steps of negotiation, scheduling and reservation in an AMA.…”
Section: D) Application Main Agent (Ama)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the MAAG, each service is managed independently by an intelligent agent. The agent manages requests, negotiates with service consumers, performs advanced reservation [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] and measures QoS metrics of all instances of a grid service in a specific grid site. Also each grid application has an intelligent agent who is responsible for application execution respecting to the QoS constraints defined by its owner.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Today's adhoc networks support a diverse set of services that require different priorities and different allocations of bandwidth for traffic delivery. P2P topologies are scalable to meet the needs of hundreds, thousands, and even tens of thousands of users [5].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each incoming request has its own Importance Level (IL) [2] which simply identifies its QoS class. The smaller IL means the higher importance.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%