2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2017.08.1906
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A hybrid genetic algorithm to solve a multi-objective Pickup and Delivery Problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The second comparison is made between HPSO and HG which is proposed in [12]. The comparison is also made between HPSO and real pareto front/approached pareto front.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The second comparison is made between HPSO and HG which is proposed in [12]. The comparison is also made between HPSO and real pareto front/approached pareto front.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The drawback of the proposed method is that only one non dominated solution can be obtained. Therefore, hybrid genetic algorithm (HG) was proposed in [12]. The method can find high quality solutions, but the number of non dominated solutions was also limited.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To address the same variant, researchers have used a hybrid Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm [9]. Furthermore, two metaheuristic approaches were used to solve the SPDPTWPD: the first one is based on a hybrid genetic algorithm [10] and the second one combines a simulated annealing with a local search procedure [11].…”
Section: A Pickup and Delivery Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To confirm that each route begins and finishes at the depot, we used constraints (5) and (6). The respect of each vehicle capacity is guaranteed by (7),(8), (9) and (10). Constraints (11) update the starting service time at each node for each scenario while taking into account the associated traveling time.…”
Section: Exact Approach For the Rspdpmentioning
confidence: 99%