1995
DOI: 10.1016/0377-2217(94)00154-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A hybrid heuristic for the generalized assignment problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There are a wide range of suitable meta‐heuristics for solving the subproblems for and , including simulated annealing and tabu search [ Osman , 1995; Higgins , 2001], genetic algorithms [ Chu and Beasley , 1996], and hybrid heuristics [ Amini and Racer , 1995]. Any of these methods could have been applied and a comparison between methods is beyond the scope of this paper.…”
Section: Solution Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are a wide range of suitable meta‐heuristics for solving the subproblems for and , including simulated annealing and tabu search [ Osman , 1995; Higgins , 2001], genetic algorithms [ Chu and Beasley , 1996], and hybrid heuristics [ Amini and Racer , 1995]. Any of these methods could have been applied and a comparison between methods is beyond the scope of this paper.…”
Section: Solution Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[53] Algorithm 1 Set the decision variables X best , H best , Z best ¼ 0 Initialise X ¼ 0, H ¼ midpoint weir heights Repeat Solve for X using Algorithm 2 Solve for H using Algorithm 3 UNTIL There is no further improvement in the solution [54] There are a wide range of suitable meta-heuristics for solving the subproblems for x m i and h m l , including simulated annealing and tabu search [Osman, 1995;Higgins, 2001], genetic algorithms [Chu and Beasley, 1996], and hybrid heuristics [Amini and Racer, 1995]. Any of these methods could have been applied and a comparison between methods is beyond the scope of this paper.…”
Section: Solution Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among recent exact algorithms for GAP are a branch-and-price algorithm by Savelsbergh [38] and a branch-and-cut algorithm by Nauss [23], where exact optimal solutions to many benchmark instances with up to 200 jobs and 20 agents were obtained by Nauss [23]. Among various heuristic and metaheuristic algorithms developed for GAP are a combination of the greedy method and local search by Martello and Toth [20,21]; a tabu search and simulated annealing approach by Osman [26]; a genetic algorithm by Chu and Beasley [7]; variable depth search methods by Amini and Racer [4,31]; a tabu search approach by Laguna et al [16]; a set partitioning heuristic by Cattrysse et al [6]; a relaxation heuristic by Lorena and Narciso [18]; a GRASP and MAX-MIN ant system combined with local search and tabu search by Louren co and Serra [19]; a linear relaxation heuristic by Trick [41]; a tabu search algorithm by Dà az and Fernà andez [8]; an ejection chain approach and a path relinking approach by Yagiura et al [42,43]; and so on. Motivated by practical applications, various generalizations of GAP have been proposed, e.g., the multi-level generalized assignment problem by Laguna et al [16]; the dynamic multi-resource generalized assignment problem by Shtub and Kogan [39]; the generalized multi-assignment problem by Park et al [27]; the multi-resource generalized assignment problem with additional constraints by Privault and Herault [30]; and so forth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…are 72 instances, i.e., one instance for each combination of the type (C, D or E), n (100 or 200), m (5, 10 or 20) and s(1, 2, 4 or 8). The generated MRGAP instances are available at our web site 4. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the constant search for optimal solutions to the GAP, the use of heuristics is most important, as shown in the works by Cattrysse and Van Wassenhove [58], Cattrysse, Salomon [59], Amini and Racer [60] and Lorena and Narciso [61], where it has accelerated the search for solutions to the optimisation problem. By developing the HC route assignment algorithm presented herein, we built on the results of Ribeiro and Pradin [62], who relied on a two-phase method: firstly, selecting and assigning similar HC assistance tasks (Phase 1); secondly, establishing a new division and reallocation to minimise possible inefficiency (Phase 2), similarly to the work presented by Hiermann and Prandtstetter [31].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%