2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2015.01.089
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A hybrid input–output multi-objective model to assess economic–energy–environment trade-offs in Brazil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
23
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, combining IOA with a multi-objective linear programming (MOLP) model allows us to capture the nature of diverse aspects, which are often conflicting and non-commensurate [26]. Due to these advantages, an increasing number of studies use multi-objective input-output linear programming models to evaluate synergies and trade-offs in the nexus of economy-society-energy [27], economy-energy-environment [28][29][30][31], and foodenergy-water [32,33]. However, most related methods developed recently cover only a few aspects of social, economic, energy, resources, and environmental objectives and lack comprehensive consideration of all sustainable elements and their integration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, combining IOA with a multi-objective linear programming (MOLP) model allows us to capture the nature of diverse aspects, which are often conflicting and non-commensurate [26]. Due to these advantages, an increasing number of studies use multi-objective input-output linear programming models to evaluate synergies and trade-offs in the nexus of economy-society-energy [27], economy-energy-environment [28][29][30][31], and foodenergy-water [32,33]. However, most related methods developed recently cover only a few aspects of social, economic, energy, resources, and environmental objectives and lack comprehensive consideration of all sustainable elements and their integration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The term "hybrid" herein represents not only the integration of IO and process based data, but also the combined use of both physical (process-based) and monetary (IO-based) data, which opens the possibility of combining environmental and economic aspects [209], [213], [214]. In the hybrid models the combination of physical and monetary units into the IO matrices is made, in which new rows and columns are included for energy sectors, substituting flows in monetary units by flows in physical units [215]. The use of the hybrid IO formulation helps eliminating the effect of price distortion on the results,…”
Section: Input-output Multi-objective Models To Assess Economic-energmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[228][229][230][231]. IO-MOLP models using hybrid frameworks and external expansions of the IO model have been used to assess energy-environment-economic-social objectives [215], [232][233][234]. Some studies have developed MOLP models based on IO analysis incorporating explicitly the uncertainty treatment: Chang and Juang [235] and Chang [236] have applied a MOLP model with fuzzy coefficients in the objective function; Borges and Antunes [237] have developed a MOLP with fuzzy coefficients in the objective function and in the right hand side vector; Henriques and Antunes [238] have applied an MOLP model with interval coefficients in the objective function, the right hand side vector and also in technical coefficients.…”
Section: Input-output Multi-objective Models To Assess Economic-energmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…You et al [11] integrate life-cycle assessment and social aspects such as local job creation due to supply chain activities in a multi-objective framework, solved by a Pareto-optimality approach. Carvalho et al [40] present a multi-objective linear programming model based on an I-O framework, which balances gross domestic product, employment and energy use (emissions). Obviously, the various approaches will yield different insights to be used in different analyses as discussed in Section 5.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%