2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.01.045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A hybrid land use regression/AERMOD model for predicting intra-urban variation in PM2.5

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
36
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We used Inverse Distance Weighted (IDW) to interpolate the air pollution data from the 35 monitoring stations to general spatial maps for spatial comparison. This method for spatial interpolation was applied to characterize spatial distributions of pollutant concentrations in some studies [43][44][45][46]. The IDW-based interpolation maps of PM 2.5 and O 3 were produced using a random 70% of points [15] and validated with the remaining 30% of data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used Inverse Distance Weighted (IDW) to interpolate the air pollution data from the 35 monitoring stations to general spatial maps for spatial comparison. This method for spatial interpolation was applied to characterize spatial distributions of pollutant concentrations in some studies [43][44][45][46]. The IDW-based interpolation maps of PM 2.5 and O 3 were produced using a random 70% of points [15] and validated with the remaining 30% of data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Integrated PM 2.5 samples were collected using Harvard Impactors (Air Diagnostics and Engineering, Inc, Harrison, ME) and analyzed for BC using reflectometry (EEL43M Smokestain Reflectometer; Diffusion Systems, Ltd, London, UK). We combined data from both seasons to develop hybrid land‐use regression models, which estimate spatial variation in air pollution as a function of geographic information system (GIS)‐based source covariates (eg, traffic density, industrial emissions), and output from an AERMOD emissions dispersion model, which better accounts for the impact of meteorology and local topography on local source emissions . Patients addresses were geocoded in GIS using a composite address locator designed to maximize positional accuracy, and residence‐specific pollution exposures were estimated as the average value from the spatial model within the 300 meters surrounding each home.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We combined data from both seasons to develop hybrid land-use regression models, which estimate spatial variation in air pollution as a function of geographic information system (GIS)-based source covariates (eg, traffic density, industrial emissions), and output from an AERMOD emissions dispersion model, which better accounts for the impact of meteorology and local topography on local source emissions. 20 Patients addresses were geocoded in GIS using a composite address locator designed to maximize positional accuracy, and residence-specific pollution exposures were estimated as the average value from the spatial model within the 300 meters surrounding each home. Finally, to estimate longterm exposures during a 5-year window (2009-2013), we temporally adjusted all exposure estimates using average daily concentrations for that period from an EPA regulatory monitor, centrally located within the original sampling domain.…”
Section: Ambient Air Quality Sampling and Exposure Assignmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be mentioned that one of the limitations of this study is the propagation of the intrinsic error of the dispersion model in the HFIS model. This limitation is common in nearly all studies which integrate the dispersion and regression models to overcome their drawbacks [26,[28][29][30]65]. However, these studies reveal that, despite this limitation, especially when a specific source of pollution is to be modeled, applying the dispersion models in generating the regression model contributes to model accuracy improvement.…”
Section: Scenarios Evaluationsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…This dispersion model was used in numerous EHIAs for modeling the pollution caused by a specific source of emission [59][60][61][62][63][64][65].…”
Section: Hierarchical Fuzzy Inference Model For Modeling Traffic Relamentioning
confidence: 99%