2019 4th South-East Europe Design Automation, Computer Engineering, Computer Networks and Social Media Conference (SEEDA-CECNSM 2019
DOI: 10.1109/seeda-cecnsm.2019.8908289
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Hybrid Method for Sentiment Analysis of Election Related Tweets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, in a study [25], the authors employed tools such as Natural Language Toolkit (NLTK), Tweet Natural Language Processing (TweetNLP) toolkit, Scikit-learn, and Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) statistical package to predict ideological orientation (conservative or rightleaning, progressive or left-leaning) of 24,900 tweets collected over 9 h during an election, achieving an overall accuracy of 99.8% using Random Forest. Similarly, in [26], Scikit-learn was utilized to analyze 46,705 Greek tweets over 20 days during an election, achieving a Random Forest accuracy of 0.80 and precision values of Negative = 0.74, Neutral = 0.83, and Positive = 1.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, in a study [25], the authors employed tools such as Natural Language Toolkit (NLTK), Tweet Natural Language Processing (TweetNLP) toolkit, Scikit-learn, and Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) statistical package to predict ideological orientation (conservative or rightleaning, progressive or left-leaning) of 24,900 tweets collected over 9 h during an election, achieving an overall accuracy of 99.8% using Random Forest. Similarly, in [26], Scikit-learn was utilized to analyze 46,705 Greek tweets over 20 days during an election, achieving a Random Forest accuracy of 0.80 and precision values of Negative = 0.74, Neutral = 0.83, and Positive = 1.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an example, terms such as wonderful, beautiful, and joy have a positive sentiment score, while terms such as fear and sadness have a negative one [90]. SA techniques are applied to almost every social domain because opinions are critical to almost all human behaviors [136]. Opinion mining and sentiment analysis methods can be applied to the SM comments [137] to automatically identify issues that concern citizens, as well as features they liked [138].…”
Section: Sentiment Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies [8] and [9] both focused solely on the polarity dimension and utilized traditional/outdated Natural Language Processing (NLP) tools, combined with classic machine learning algorithms (e.g., random forest, decision trees, Support Vector Machine classifiers). In contrast, [10] focused on offensiveness and exploited DNNs, such as Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) and Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU) networks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%