2015 16th International Radar Symposium (IRS) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/irs.2015.7226253
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A hybrid method for surface current estimation using X-band nautical radar

Abstract: In this paper, a new method is proposed to estimate surface current using X-band nautical radar. This method is referred to as the Hybrid Least Squares (HLS) method. The HLS combines the existing Iterative Least Squares (ILS) and Normalized Scalar Product (NSP) methods. The HLS is designed to inherit the short ILS computational time and the high NSP reliability. For validation, the proposed method was applied on a number of simulated X-band nautical radar image sets. Results have shown that the HLS produces ac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unfortunately, U is unknown. However, several methods have been proposed to estimate it [6,[10][11][12]19,23].…”
Section: Review Of Wave Spectrum Estimation Using Marine Radarmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Unfortunately, U is unknown. However, several methods have been proposed to estimate it [6,[10][11][12]19,23].…”
Section: Review Of Wave Spectrum Estimation Using Marine Radarmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies in this area have focused on minimizing the sources of error in the original method. For example, several methods have been proposed to enhance the accuracy of surface current estimation which is used to exclude the non-wave spectrum component from the wave spectrum and to calculate the spectrum signal to noise ratio (SNR) [11,12,19]. Other studies focused on the Modulation Transfer Function (MTF) which is used to compensate for the distortion presented in the wave spectrum due to the radar imaging process [4,9,20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%